Laserfiche WebLink
w - <br /> ■ <br /> 10 <br /> Mr. & Mrs. Geldma.ohe 'p Lot B. Frog Pond: Close. Mashpee,_cont. <br /> Pauline: Absolutely. <br /> W ne: We grant to make sure that it is put in right. It is all handwork obviously. <br /> Mr. Geldmachert If and when the stairway does get built, 1 would be more than happy <br /> to see that it was built under the supervision of the Conservation Commission. <br /> Pauline: If we issue and order of Conditions, if that is not built within one year, <br /> you will have to come back for an extension. <br /> Mr. eld ach-er: it won't be ilt within one year. Would that necessitate a' per- <br /> sonal aappearane' <br /> Pauline: Send a certified letter and we will send out an extension. <br /> Wayne: 1 am curious about the split-rail fence, <br /> Mr. eldmache : My engineer said to go for everything- that we might want. A split- <br /> rail -fence <br /> plit- <br /> r it - nca is ,just to define the Property basically, <br /> KMe: Asad you have a stockade fence over on John's side? <br /> Mr. Geldmachert . Yes, for privacy. <br /> Pauline: We request that heavy equipment be kept on the street side, not on the <br /> bank side. We will put that into , your order of Conditions. As soon as we get a: <br /> PEW number, we will get an Order of Conditions drawn up. DERE may say: "No, :tai <br /> Mr. eldmacher if they deny the stairs, we may appeal to them. Is that correct? <br /> Pauline: Right. There is a 'ten-day appeal period. <br /> Wayne. I there a reason why the garage is detached <br /> Mr. l coacher: 1 would rather have it attached. 1 would still maintain the angle <br /> of the garage. <br /> a nes Anything_ you did would be better than where it is now. <br /> Robert Johnson _§uperintend ent of New Seab RP <br /> Mr. Johnson: Introduces 'himself to the Board. Tells them that he is the superinten <br /> nt over in New Seabury and also a liason person appointed by New Seabury act be- <br /> tween the town regulatory boards and New Seabury. 1 am here merely for guidance thi <br /> evening. , Shows the Board plan down at Mauhop; the Second Phase. The cottage in <br /> question is 9-C belonging to Nancy Burden. The -original building has-been taken down <br /> a.t-new cottage wilbebuilt. 'rhe top of the bluff is so-marked here on the plan: from <br /> Mayes a g .neering. The limited ,jurisdiction, the loo foot setback, is so denoted. <br /> Pauline: Are you moving water lines? Is that what you are doing <br />