Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> Mashpee Conservati n. Commission <br /> M�nut es of, May l l ir 1981' <br /> a ► � 2' . <br /> y ' <br /> � <br /> } - <br /> ausho Determination-,- cont. .. <br /> .Pauline- eDory asked Arlene- how', deep'. the- bas- ins.-would. b att r• a e_-replied <br /> that he' understood that the' tops of;,the pits, themsel e quld'," a...about <br /> i feet and- everything would- be- be-i w that',' - She mentioned that.rth.djre <br /> would be a. second,. small-basin- and pointed out the- area.. on' theti pI ►ri..'� { , <br /> Charlie asked if they were p ann-i.ng.' to: vegetate-- the sides? A-rlene': told;_ <br /> the Commission .that it would be vegetated, and_ 1-andscaped- as they. plan to.. <br /> hide some of the depth of it. She mentioned that they were talkl.ng, about <br /> building a wooden walkway around- the edge with a. rook garden. <br /> As a general question, Dave 'Ferry asked how lona the Commission is going - <br /> to allow building inside the loo feet limit commenting that he does- not <br /> care for the overcrowding that is being allowed on fronts - such- as, the - one <br /> being -discussed. Arlene Wilson. commented that they are trying to get -the <br /> buildings roved back as they are now significantly closer to the bank, She <br /> mentioned that no additional buildings would be added to the front tow-.- <br /> After <br /> ow-:After discussion on the subject,.,. Charlie Buckingham moved that a notice .rof <br /> intent rust be fi.iedO ' Dorothy orothy Studley seconded the motion. All._voted . ins <br /> favor. Arlene Wilson commented-that it' was up to the Commission to prove _ <br /> that impact would - e mace on the buffer zone. Charlie Buckingham re tined <br /> the motion. _ Pauline DeLory moved that the hearing on the determnination- <br /> b con t3.nued unto,l -March 25.,., ,1983.. March Dardano seconded: the motion-.` <br /> 'Dave 'ferry commented that he would- like t discuss it furthe � tonight. Vote <br /> -1 Motion carried. <br /> eq2es.t to Amender � f Conditions SE43-O'bAR230 <br /> The Commission reviewed a requ st rade. by Bill Warwick, who is -representing. <br /> Wellington Oilfi6ld o-wrier of cottage 606/10 Maushop Village to amend- the <br /> order of conditions so that the cottage could be- relocated to an area. not <br /> less than 35 feet from the edge of the bluff instead of 40 feet as stated, <br /> Mr. Warwick explained ,to the Commission sion that the cottage could be on top f <br /> an " water* main if roved as stated in the order of conditions, Nor* Warwick <br /> explained that the top of the bluff would be higher than the siteo He told. <br /> the Commission that there would be no roof drainage over the bluff as it <br /> would go to a catch .basin. March asked if i't could be turned at an angle?, <br /> Mr,, Warwick commented that- they could pick . p i� feet by angling the cottage; <br /> however, he felt that the' location being proposed` is reasonable as he d. d not <br /> think it should b , close to a water main. No further questions, were- asked, <br /> The Commission unanimously voted to amend the current order of conditions <br /> from 406feet to 35 feet. <br /> ReqLiest for Certificate of Cori fiance - - 1.17 <br /> In response to 'a to' request that a certificate of compliance be issued for <br /> John P. and Eva K.- Breyerls property lodated at 256 Crostree Way, Masi e , <br /> the Commission issued same Board member, Charlie Buckinghame viewed the <br /> site and assured the Board that the order of conditions had been 6omplied <br /> with, <br />