My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7/13/1983 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
>
7/13/1983 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/30/2018 5:25:03 PM
Creation date
1/30/2018 3:40:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
CONSERVATION COMMISSION
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
07/13/1983
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mashpee Conservation Commission <br /> mutes of July 13, 1983 Page <br /> Hearincl of John sullivan, cont, <br /> Wayne Tavares commented that the house Is right near the top of the slope <br /> and that the hay bales were going to be placed at the 74 foot contour <br /> Chairperson Studley asked that the Natural Resource Officer look at the <br /> plan to see if it was the lot in violation of the vegetation which was <br /> stkipp d. Rob Sanders, the Natural Resource Off icer pointed out the <br /> area where the violation occurred on the lot next door, which is also <br /> owned by Mr. Sullivan, <br /> Peter Durmer asked Mr. Raymond why the owner warted to place the house <br /> so close to the edge of the bank. Mr. Raymond replied that he would like <br /> the view of the Mashpee Pond. He explained that if he pushed the house <br /> back, he could get into a breakout situation with the septic system through <br /> the sloping of the land as he would have to f�l1 more land. Peter Durmer <br /> commented that he was only speaking a few feet. Wayne Tavares explained to <br /> Mr. Raymond that the Commission usually asked that it be kept back a cer- <br /> tain distance from the top of the bank as he would need another 10 to 12 ft. <br /> for working space: therefore, wiping out another area which would be open <br /> to erosion, Wayne told Mr. Raymond that the hay bales should be placed on <br /> top of the slope; thereby, pushing the house back. Mr. Raymond maintained <br /> that the .house would have stay as shown for the septic system because <br /> of the overflow. He asked how far the C mmiss-.on would -request that it be <br /> pushed back from the bank. Wayne replied "lo feet". Dorothy said that it <br /> should be 20 feet from the top of the bank. Wayne said that if it were <br /> pushed back 10 feet it would not hurt it, but 20 feet would, Mr. Raymond <br /> asked the Commission to review the septic system area - as he def initely felt <br /> that the overflow would be a problem if the house were pushed back. Wayne <br /> said that he would recommend some sort of a retaining wall be built if the <br /> house had to stay as shown. <br /> Peter Durmer commented that the house was 40 feet across the crest and asked <br /> if it could be set the ether way on the lot. Mr. Raymond commented that the <br /> lots are very tight and that they are within two feet of the side lime re- <br /> quirements, <br /> 'Mr. Raymond told the Commission that -he would consult with the owner to <br /> see if the house could be pushed back. Chairperson Studley told Mr. Ray- <br /> mond that any revisions should be submitted to the Commission prior to their <br /> next meeting which will be held within two weeks. <br /> Hearing of max and Anne Kaufman, Lot 630 Gleneagle Drive <br /> Mr. William Warwick and Mr. Priestly were present to represent the applicant <br /> in an intent to construct and maintain a three--bedroom dwelling, to construct <br /> stone rip-rap wall and to remove ,snags and dead vegetation from drainage <br /> area within loo feet of an isolated wetland area. <br /> Mr. Warwick explained to the Commission that they have a situation where <br /> they want to reclaim an -area of isolated wetland and provide an equal amount <br /> o excavated area to maintain the drainage basin which is provided for in i <br /> the new regulations. Mr. Warwick told the Commission that the isolated wet_ <br /> land has nothing to do with the ground water system whatsoever as they dug <br /> a test pit 12 f eet deep (which is below the water level of the basin) . He <br /> commented that they built a swimming pool on lot 41 and went down 14 feet <br /> and still did not hit any water at all. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.