5/9/1984 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes

Home Browse Search

Nashpee Conservation Commission �- nutes of Vay , 1984 page to Discussion on Mausho2 Violation, cont, Charlie Buckingham said he unfortunately had not been able to attend meetings. Jean Thomas asked if he read any of the material pertaining to the issue.- Mr. Buckingham said he did not have chance to. Nis. �. Collin' s made a formal request to receive a copy of any letters pertain- ` ing to the issue. Reference was made to the letter from John Henning dated May 7. ms., Collins indicated that she had not received her copy of the letter as of yet. It was noted that the letter had been carbon copied to BSC, Cape Cod Survey Consultants (Ms. Collins ' office) . Charlie Buckingham said that he remembered when discussing the beach nourishment program that there were two points which were made: 1, The cottage at the end of the line could not be moved because in moving it it would interfere with the truck access to that path going down. He said at the same time the Commission discussed that, he was quite sure that the commission discussed the condition of the dawn slope which gage access to the beach. He said he believed that some part of the discussion that was discussed was whether or not it was trespassing on Rock Landing . .ociates ' property. Dlr,. Buckingham said to his recollection at that time was that the Commission said that a► decent access road to the beach be created so that further erosion would be prevented, He said he dial not remember if the Commission stated specifically except that it should be at that point upon New Seabury' s property and not an inch upon Rock Landing's property. He said that we made no engineering claims as to how it should be ,created; we simpler said that we wanted it created in such a way that it would prevent further erosion and that the erosion that had already taker place should be taken care of. He said he though that was the way the 'con- ditions were created. *'Ir. Buckingham said that in listening to what he was hearing tonight and having been down in the area to see ust what has taken place, where -the dotted line is showing the edge of the bank of the old ac- cess point referring to the plan) , he -pointed out the top of the bank and the road as it already exists:. . M.T. Buckingham pointed out that there was black top from the old road which was still on surface that he figured would be removed in order to complete the rest of the grading. He said that the clamshell road is starting quite a ways up. He said he had no ar- gument in what was being done and it was better than what had existed prior than to the construction of the road. He said that the clamshells did not intrude on the bead area; they were ditched and set below grade as he remembered. He said he had been there after some rains and could not see any disturbance of anything there. He said that he could not really see why a stop was put on it, Jean Thomas said that he should read the material which he had not react be- fore making that determination. Reference again was rade to Inning' s letter. h1s. Collins said that the Hennings were in communication with Dave Shepardson and ,'"3am ' ygatt of MEPA. She said she received phone calls from the MEPA people and she answered their questions and they said "fine" and thea asked her t call the Hennings t eplain it to them. Ms. Collins said that she believes that in this particular instance New eabury has acted in good faith in complying with what, was their understanding of the access r route as well as a repeated venal request by the Commission to keep all work back 50 Feet and further from that bank. she said that by demeaning this area and establishing that connection, the maushop Village 'trustees are _i n the process of tai i ng l Baal action to this owner pointing out the cot- tage on the plan) to move his house back so that the entire line is back. She said that if this has to be re-established that cannot be done* there can't be any pressure put on- him. .t