Laserfiche WebLink
Mashpee Conservation Commission <br /> Meeting of March 2 , 1986 <br /> Page siX <br /> and it is covered under the tax bill in the name of Cartal <br /> Development Corp. Mr. Rosenberg noted that presumably,ably, the <br /> land court could require changes in the dimensions . Mrd Bergman <br /> allowed that this could occur. He explained at some length <br /> The proposed project is located on a coastal bank, A driveway i <br /> also proposed. There will be a septic system. Water source '.s <br /> Highwood Water Company. There is a marsh at the foot of' the bark. <br /> The area of activity is upwardof the flood hazard zone . Hay bales <br /> will be staked at the work limit at wherere-grading is proposed, <br /> The bank is quite stable and well-vegetated. There is no intention <br /> to do any cutting of - tre r any vegetation on that hill. The <br /> roof will be guttered. Dry wells can be put in. <br /> Ms . Jaca.bson inquired as to whether or not the house could be moved <br /> back to a. more level area.. <br /> Ms . Be hrman pointed out that the driveway is certainly at some <br /> point within too 1 of the wetland . Mr. Bergman stated that that <br /> porton within loo' has already been covered by an order of Condi-- <br /> tions . <br /> Ms . Behr pan noted that some additional filling had been done on the <br /> right of the house . Mr. Bergman stated that this is so . Ms . Behrr an <br /> is concerned that the re-grading is very close to the marsh, It is <br /> to the very top of the bank, she stated that it appears basically <br /> the only area left with vegetation as is , is probably below the 20 ' <br /> contour. Mr. Bergman said that the 34' , the 321 and the 3o' contour <br /> are being relocated on the easterly side of the lot but at the <br /> point at the area,, there is only normal re-grading at the 26' con- <br /> tour as is the 28' ; 'but nothing downslope of the 26, contour. <br /> Mr. ergman conceded that there will be quite a bit of re-grading <br /> and stripping along the easterly side of the lot . <br /> There is a great deal of concern about the possibility of severe <br /> erosion at this point . It was at this time that it was agreed to <br /> continue this hearing to allow the applicant to fora a solution <br /> to the situation or to modify the plan. It was also decided that <br /> plans for Lot #9 ockway Bay have same measure of effect on this <br /> proposal . Proposal for Lot #9 is to be heard on March 27 , 1986 . <br /> Attention was called to letter written on March 13 , 1986 to John <br /> La ders-Ca 1 y of Holmes and McGrath regarding Ockway Bay properties <br /> in which revised plans shoving setbacks from the edge of the wetland <br /> areas is stated to be required before any orders of Conditions are <br /> issued . <br />