My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
9/4/1986 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
>
9/4/1986 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/16/2018 5:13:27 PM
Creation date
2/16/2018 1:20:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
CONSERVATION COMMISSION
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
09/04/1986
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Conservation Commission <br /> Meeting o September +� l <br /> Page 3. <br /> E. L. shore, Continued: Mrs. Ferriday stated it would have to be 'shown, ory the-:. ,; <br /> landscaping plan that water coning out of the corner would not further er e`4r'. <br /> the bank. Mr, Donnelly asked if the patio were designed like the pr&sous <br /> hearing, Connearney, would the Commission approve. It was suggested the pa' to <br /> be moved over at an angle and not to go forward of the cottage. Mr. Van ol..All <br /> agreed to show plantings for both cottages together on the plans. <br /> Mr.- Donnelly requested a continuance to a 1 l ow them to consult the records ,4h& <br /> legal ourisel . He agreed to come back in three weeks with a mod i f i'ed. p]'-an.., . <br /> In answer to Mr. shore's question, the commission stated there were no. questions <br /> concerning the cottage itself. _ <br /> John Brooks , an abutter, questioned how far back from the bank the cottage. i . <br /> at present. It was stated it is ' feet. <br /> Summarizing, it was stated the commission would like verifi ation as h - ::-:: . <br /> the earlier permit required as to the location of the cottage, a. Cert i f F: *, } <br /> of Compliance, an alternative landscape plan with the patio front lusK,Wltth., <br /> the cottage and the file number for the bark stabilization and whether o.r :,n - .. <br /> signed off. <br /> Reliance Construntiori F.J. Flynn Engineering) To construct a 750 unit P-Tanmid.r <br /> Retirement Community i n four phases . This filing is for construction of road% <br /> ways , 245 residential units and sewage treatment plant, comprising Phase. ti, ;t_q`. <br /> Martha's Pond, north of route 1 1 . V. Louise Behrman stood down, as ars abU r',. <br /> but stated she had received no notice of the hearing . <br /> Gertrude Ferriday stated the Planning Board has not heard this proposal . <br /> VOTE: Motion made by March du Pont that this hearing be continued until i <br /> has gone before the Planning Board. seconded and Voted. <br /> Ms duPont stated they were told they could not fille for 245 units and that each <br /> un it must be filed individually. r. Flynn stated he disagreed with this and <br /> that there are no wetlands in Phase 1 . John Va r Fonda s to ted be wou I d I l ke to <br /> iwalk the proposed areas with a representative prior to their coming back before <br /> the coram 1 ss i on. <br /> CONTINUED INDEFINITELY. <br /> Nick D repanos , (Cape & Islands urveying) To construct o single fareit residence <br /> at 277 Taff ra i l Way. John s l av i nsky presenting . He stated approve 1 has been re- <br /> ceived from the Board of Health. Driveway to be of pervious material . There w i l l <br /> be no vista cutting and no pruning . A double row of hay bales as shown on the <br /> plan with drywells for roof run-off. (March duFont left due to i 11 ness at 8:50) <br /> Mr. Slavinsky stated everything can be done with a crane from the side of the <br /> house. The driveway will be even with the road. He stated this house may b <br /> scaled down and plans are in the preliminary stage. A set of working plans was <br /> requested and fir. slavi nsky agreed. <br /> As this is in the flood zone, there is no basement floor and wi 1 l be to flood plan <br /> standards. The work 1 ire i t wi l 1 be pushed back to 5 feet. <br /> It was noted landscaping plans must be submitted to the commission for approval . <br /> Mr. VanTol stated he would be concerned with any possible walk out in the back. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.