10/23/1986 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes

Home Browse Search

ashpee Conservation Commission Meeting of October 23, 1986 Pag e 2. 8: - Will i am Burke & Stephen Bel k i n, Lots 527 528 Triton Way. To construct and maintain a stone revetment and landscaping . Peggy Fantozzi , Cape Cod survey Consultant representing Mr. Be 1 ki n, Lot 528. She advised to help mitigate the ongoing problems, Mr. Be 1 k i n will contribute, Oon his own if the Commission deems necessary, to a nourishment program or to Contribute into the on-going permitted New Seabury Regional Beach nourishment program with an additional amount of sand. At the top of Mr. Bel k i n ' s bank, mounding in certain areas is planned due to drainage the t goes down the bank causing problems. The rest of the bank w it l be vegetated and stabilized. Access will be from Tide Watch for which permission has been received from New Sea bu ry and also to place some of the stone in various areas of the beach due to confusion in ownership, Ms Fa n to i stated fill has not been calculated. A 1 -1/2 on 1 slope is to be obtained. The intent i s that once fill is placed and graded, the bank will be l oame and seeded, if possible. The plan for reveg a to t i on is as on the Maus hop Village Plan. Existing concrete breakwaters will be pulled out and reoriented. Urban C l Oran and Debra O'Malley presenting for Mr. Burke. Ms O'Malley presented from their files a request dated 5/29/79 to the Conservation Commission and a response from the Commission giving permission to repair the wall for damage from winter storms . It i s proposed to extend the wall proposed by Mr . Bel ki n and integrate with the Burke proposal for a vertical extension to protect the Burke property from further erosion. The amount of fill used will be only that sufficient to support the stones with a F i l ter cloth placed behind the stones . Ms du Pont raised question of allowing a revetment on a vacant lot which would set a precedent. Ms Fantoi cited the Commission denial for a revetment on the N renberg property which was allowed by the State as the precedent, John Va rkonda stated beach nourishment cou1d not be conditioned by the Comm- ission. Ms Fantozzi stated that in the filing a letter from Chris Burden states that a condition of the agreement is that 125% of the sand; that is kept from joining the system has to be contributed to the ongoing' nourishment. That is part of the f i l i n and part of the agreement. Ms Beh rman requested a copy of this documentation as part of the file that this will be done. Ms O' Ma l l ey adv k sed rete i pts f rom abutters a re s t ill cm i ng i n . Three responses were presented. HEARING CLOSED - on the understanding documentation will be provided to the Commission as requested. ORDER OF CONN T 1 ONS WITHIN 21 DAYS. John V a rkonda advised of a request for a superced i ng order from D E E on John Bo 1 ger' s bank repair. one of the orders of Conditions was that no revetment or Coastal engineering structure would be allowed. The house was built before 1978. During an inspection with Brett Burdick, he recommended a superced i rig n app] 'cation fora revetment was received. order. The same day