10/30/1986 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes

Home Browse Search

w ashpee Conservation Commission Meeting of October 30, 1986 Page 3. One of the questions raised was the specific delineation of the wetlands. Plans were modified due to Planning Board comments in the course of an -site last Saturday. Copies of a map will be requested for use by the Commission. Harbor Management Plan: Ms Behrman reported there was a preliminary meeting on October 29 with Waterways and Shellfish in an effort to get a plan together. They have requested material on existing docks and permitted docks . An inventory of the files would provide addresses and D EE numbers. There was discusi on of sending a letter to owners of docks requesting the numbers be p 1 aced on the f 1 oa is. E. L. Shore: Peter Shore, Attorney, representing E. L. Shore advised the commission they are concerned with condition #14 of the Order of Conditions re construction of a revetment or seawall . It is not their intent to build a wall at this time, but should conditions change in the future, this condition would preclude construction. Also, the application did not address this issue and the decision was made without their being afforded an opportunity to be heard on that issue. There was discussion f the date when the Fuse was built and also the date moved. The notice from DE E was read concerning this spec i f i c order. Mr. Shore stated the land involved i not owned by Mr. Shore but by the Maushop Condominium Association. He stated the issue is that the order is made now a-nd if the Condo Association comes in later with a request, Mr. Shore would have to incur 1egai expenses to have ak temporary restraining order issued, i n order to comply i th the Order of Conditions. Mrs. Marsters read from the regulations: The Order of Conditions and Certificate of Compliance for any new building within 100 feet landward of the top of a coastal bank permitted by the issuing authority under this act shall contain the specific condition 310 CMR 10-30 of the Wetland Regulations promulgated under M.G.L. Chapter 131 , Section 40 requires that no coastal engineering structure such as a bulkhead, revetment or seawall shall be permitted on an eroding bank at any time in the future to protect the project a1lowed by this Order of Conditions. Mr. Shore stated he doubts the application of this condition to the project as the house was moved within the parameters f the a i s t I ng foundation and Mr. and Mrs. Shore do not own the land in question. After discussion i t was agreed to reword the condition and add at the beginning the words Pursuant to. Mr. Shore stated he will resear;.h the cons i dera t i-on of the property as a new structure due to the move . nd will also contaet D E E. It was noted that as the notary was not dated the appeals period had not lapsed. Bowden - 6 Vale lane: Requesting an amended Notice of Intent and Amended order of Conditions . A landscaping plan was submitted and approved . The style of the house has now been changed to a cape and the retaining wa 1 l s were roved from the rear to the front of the house per advice of the engineer to improve drainage character i s t i cs drywel 1 plan was submitted for approval . Reta i n i rig wa l 1 s are proposed to prevent disturbance of root systems. John advised he does not feel this is a viable alter- native. ltr- native.