2/26/1987 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes

Home Browse Search

lashpee Conservation Commission Meeting nf February 26, 1987 a e 9. Mrs . Jacobson requested a further discussion of the Mirliss project. She stated we all sat here and discussed this and you (John) knew what our intent was and all of a sudden the whole thing is changed and he is doing exactly what he gents -over there. I do not like his letter implying about certain individuals and 1 gave up on the thing because he had been told he could go ahead and that was not the intention that this commission was giving in the order of Conditions and if you (John) had f e I t that the order of Condi t`cons was not v i abl e, then we shou l d have discussed it more. John stated he said so at the time. r. Govoni was told to remove all spoil f ro feet and was never told the pile on the side could stay. He came i n, we sat and # explainedthe order and told him, 7 feet around all that fill should be removed and revegeta ted . He asked what he could do to revegeta to and was told a ground cover, covered by a mulch. That is what he told rye he was going to do. Mrs. Jacobsen stated , he hasn' t done that and yet he' s going right on with the job. The letter only deals with #9 and #11 and #12 are pertinent . They do not have a correct order of conditions to record. Concerning Mr . -Harringtori's remark, she advised' she did not stop the work, but said to the workers that she didn' t think they ought to be doing t h i's because they were wasting their time. She told thea that she did not have the right to tell there to stop work but that she knew what was in the order of conditions and recommended they go talk to someone to find out about it. Jahn stated that was not what he wa.s told by them. There was d i-scuss ion of this matter , as in the E. L. Shore project , where parties with an order of conditions have gone to the Building Inspector and have accepted his okay as being for Conservation also. Ms Beh rma n dictated a memo to be sent to the Building Department. It was agreed the letter submitted by Mr. Govoni i s disputed b ome+ members of the commission as not being an absolute factual account of what happened. Ther- are other versions. John Stated he would l i e to initiate a new policy on violations . As written now, there is a $300 maximum imum fine for a bylaw violation i f not corrected immed- iately. He will consult with Town counsel to see if it is possible to levy the $300 fine for every day the violation persists after the ten day limit allowed to correct it. It was agreed this should go forward . There was discussion of a State fine. John will make an appointment with Town Counsel for next Thursday. Concerning Berkowitz, Ms Behrman advised according to the building permits on file with the Building Inspector , they did not exceed 0% of the structure. Therefore, fir. Berko i tz ' renovations d not constitute a new structure. The meeting was adjourned at 1 1 : o p.m. Respectfully submitted, IV LO . � f Diana M. Lund Recording Secretary