Laserfiche WebLink
Conservation Comm41 S51on <br /> Meeting of March 5, 1987 <br /> Page 3 . <br /> Ms Behrman requested that the sto i r a that goes down to the beach be sketched <br /> in . Mr . San i k i stated that would require a fu l l location i n the field . <br /> Ms . Beh ra n s to ted, a s n except o na l s l to a t ion, a i n i t c l-ea-r , -ha--t this i•s <br /> an exception o the rule, suggested a photographic record be rade part o the <br /> application staking out with pictures the addition in relation to the trench <br /> and also have it filed with D.E.Q. E. <br /> Mr . <br /> Sa r i ckC i stated a drain could be installed if required. To clarify, h <br /> stated, i n l i eu of the required scale plans, mean sea level topo, the on s e r- <br /> vation Commissiony in this exceptional situation would accept pictures once <br /> the stakes are in, with an explanation of what is depicted with a note o <br /> the setbacks. <br /> Ms Behrman stated stades should be placed and angle shots taken making sure <br /> that in the photos of when the stakes are, the Commission can see where the <br /> stakes are in relation to the revetment and steps . <br /> A brochure w i l l be provided also. <br /> VOTE; Motion made and seconded to issue a Positive Determination to Susan ' <br /> . -Realty Frust. <br /> POSITIVE DETERMINATION NOTICE OF I TE T M BE I`ILEED . <br /> : 00 - James A. Lebel (Down Cape Engineering) To construct a wooden pier and <br /> mooring Pi l e at Lot 67 River Road. Arnie Dha l a presenting . Abutters receipts <br /> ,.,,sere presented. The project has received. Board of Appeals approval . It is pro- <br /> p <br /> osed to build a timber' pier extending feet beyond jean Low pater, 3feet <br /> beyond an High Water into Great aver of salt treated timber with de i ng <br /> paced ne�i rich apart .Theexisting deco coat arrangement would be removed <br /> and this placed at .the same location. The e # s,t i ng brick retaining wall will <br /> remain and the beach will be unchanged and conditions that now enc i s t will re- <br /> main unchanged with the exception the deck would be constructed for Mr . Lebel <br /> to bring his boat up. The deck elevation is 5.2 at the top of the deck. <br /> Ms Behrman stated foot clearance i s required to mean low water to allow pub l i c <br /> access to the shore area . Mr. Ochala agreed to revise the plans .Ms Behrman <br /> further stated the two mooring piles are close to the property lanes on both <br /> sides . <br /> Mrs . herr i daY stated the Coma i s i n w u-1 d prefer a T-configuration rather than <br /> L-shaped . <br /> r. chal a stated the -shape on the p i r would be feet in width and the entire <br /> i <br /> structure i s supported on piles , it 1-5 not a float . <br /> John stated shellfish in this area iS not overly productive but would be a <br /> concern . <br /> Ms Behrman stated the amount of mooring space on a small dock would have to <br /> be <br /> considered as possible mooring sites for many boats at a future date. <br /> It was suggested the p l .r be cut down into a 15foot T-configuration. <br />