8/6/1987 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes

Home Browse Search

mashpee Conservation Commission Meeting of August 6. 1987 Page 3. ability on a proposal to remove dead tress conduct selective thinning and limb ng of trees and fertilization of retaining growth at Lots 977 and 1002 in the Highwood Area of New Seabury development. Jack Brown presenting. The purpose of the clearing s to gain a view, no underbrush will be disturbed, John stated an ori--site was done and the overall area is large with scrub pine and oak trees to be removed. Be sees no major impact due to their removal as the understory is very dense. r. Brown stated the trees will be flush cut by -hand. John suggested a root 'inhibitor be used on the ,stumps and Mr. Brown agreed, Mrs. Ferriday suggested the name of the herbicide or fungus used be provided for the record. Mr• Rosenberg asked for an oral' understanding that the Conservation Officer l be notified when work is to begin. Mr. Brown agreed, VOTE: Motion made and seconded to issue a. Negative Determination to New Seatbury Corp. Promontory point drainage project, Lot 1346F regarding the concern of the Commission re percolation from the .drain pipe into the ground before going into the pond Mr. Brown stated a letter was given John requesting a change in design to perforated wipe totally surr- unded by gravel 6 inches minimum all around, VOTE: Motion made and seconded to approve the amendment to the Order of Conditions issued on the project, Santuit� Woods Limi ted Partnership Lot 38 Nobska Road, Tina Baylog presenting. Abutters receipts will be delivered t the Conservation Officer tomorrow. The driveway will be of crush d stone* Staked haybales will be used for erosion control. All roof drains are to be recharged. The dwelling is 71 feet from the edge of the vegetated wetland. The septic is 133 feet from the edge. 25 foot buffer strip is to remain in the natural state parallel to the edge of the wetland. Fill is calculated to be 35 cu. yds. from excavation of the basement. John suggested the work 1 it be straight across and to allow water service to be cut in� Ms Behrman asked the location of this lot in relation to Conservation land and expressed concern with map being used for this project showing common beach. She requested plans have noted on them that this is Conservation land when being shown to purchasers. ' John will follow up on this. Ms Baylog agreed to bring n -a copy of the subdivision plan to the next hearing. Ms Behrman stated the previous owner was supposed to have put In cont trete bounds delineating the Conservation land. f