Laserfiche WebLink
a <br /> Niashpee Conservation commission <br /> . Meeting of September 3 1987 <br /> Page 80 <br /> Mrs. Marsters stated it seemed to he a substantial modification <br /> which generally requires Board of Health review. <br /> Ms Behrman advised under half of the abutters responses were <br /> received also* She further stated that during an oneasite it <br /> was noted there are no drywells and none proposed, It was <br /> suggested the hearing be continued pending Board of Health <br /> notification. <br /> VOTE: Motion mad a and seconded to continue the Hearing with <br /> the consent of the applicant pending Board of Health <br /> notification. <br /> John will pr6vide the Board.. with a copy of the application. <br /> 4 <br /> 9:15 Me R. Haney# Sr. H l s & McGrath) to construct and <br /> maintain a pier , ramp and float at 14 Ockway Bay Road, <br /> Nis Behrm man pointed out the address was advertised as Ockway Bay <br /> Road and is actually Great Neck Road, Mr. Palmatier withdrew <br /> the application and il.l. -resub t. Abutters are to he renotified <br /> also. <br /> WITHDRAWN* TO BE RESUBMITTED <br /> . .'. .•' <br /> 9:3 0 Banton woods Limited Partnership (Lots 74p 75A Shields <br /> Rd. and Lot 771 Tobisset St.) Tina Baylog presenting• <br /> John advised an on-site was done and 77,E Tobisset was not staked, <br /> 77A T DI s T. CONTINUED OCTOBER If 1987 at 7:30. <br /> 75A SHIELDS RD . : Ms Baylog stated staked haybales are proposed as <br /> the limit of� work.. All goof drains to be recharged, The proposed <br /> dwelling is 96 ft. from the edge of the wetland, septic system is <br /> 101 ft. from the edge of the wetland. All disturbed areas to he <br /> a <br /> mulched. No. regrading is proposed. <br /> John advised that during the on-site it was noted a road goes through <br /> the middle le of the lot, Ms Baylog stated a road easement was set <br /> aside to provide access to the bog area to the rear, She advised <br /> legal abandonment of the road would not be addressed, The easement <br /> ent <br /> was taken out of' Lot 76A for the purpose of access. <br /> Mr. Rosenberg .questioned the legality of building a house over an <br /> I <br /> existing road. <br /> John asked Mr. Leak, in the andfence! if it is a publicly travelled <br /> way and he .replied it was used to and from the bogs and is open to <br /> the general public, <br /> Ms Baylog asked Mr. Lenk if he had a problem with the applicant <br /> building an access road for him. She 'stated she had no knowledge <br /> this was an issue. <br />