My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/29/1987 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
>
10/29/1987 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/16/2018 5:05:07 PM
Creation date
2/16/2018 3:07:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
CONSERVATION COMMISSION
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
10/29/1987
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Conservation Commission Page 11 . <br /> October 29, 1987 <br /> She i n i'red which of the three best options the- comm i ss-i ori would <br /> prefer. The commission agreed they would like to look at the site . <br /> before making a decision as this was not discussed at the on-site. <br /> s -Langha s . advised Mr. Vir,81111,o has not giVen a formal approv,al and <br /> is waiting for the commission ' s action. <br /> S e stated during the on-site it had been discussed how the -'sewer <br /> project could be handled under the wetland protection act and all <br /> public utilities axe considered a limited pro, ect ,under the fresh <br /> water wetland regulations, Seraion 1053, .3D, where there are four per- <br /> for.mance standards to be met, <br /> 1 . No reasonable alternatives: -Ire this case we recosnize recognizethat the <br /> town is considering makinS a subregional sewer plant and it would be <br /> to the ben -fit o f .all that the mains of the sewer be on public <br /> property, Quihaquisset. Inds It then became, do you put it in the <br /> pavement or o-n the side of the road? As- it is too difficult to go <br /> through this -r« lvert with the sewer main it was kept on the side of - <br /> the goad. For cost, maintenance and to beep it on public property, <br /> this is the only reasonable alternative. <br /> . Best av it 'le measures to minimize the disturbance or adverse <br /> effect on the -wetland. In this case- that dewatering tabes place, i <br /> the ommissien. . .s . - n ern d about siltation, that bales of hay or a <br /> siltation barrie-r -' e used- to hold the water and in order to deep the <br /> d waterin at :a -.vi-niv m, as you cross the stream a trench box o <br /> sheeting be used that holds the sides in place and minimize the mount <br /> of water that ev es in. - n addition to that, it be excavated and back- <br /> filled <br /> ac - <br /> illed i mmedi.at- ly in small sections' . <br /> 3 . Sewer pipes be water tight andneve-nt any leakage . In this <br /> case, as it crosses the stream, the concrete casing will prevent <br /> leakage and in addition, a water tight ria-in will be used the entire <br /> distance. <br /> . Surface vegetation and contours shall be substantially <br /> restored: The cranberry bog will be rehab i l i tared. -Where they dig up <br /> the northerly ditch and the 5 foot- side area of the bog will be sub- <br /> stantially restored. <br /> Ms Behrman questioned the volume of water- and Ms Langhaus er <br /> stated no one can ell as it is ground water. She stated an engineer <br /> should be present on-sive to make decisions immediately that come up . <br /> Comments from the public: John Brophy questioned to piping to be <br /> used . ids Lan haus r advised it is 1 inch PVC gravity flow. Under the <br /> pipes will be gravel beds. <br /> It was noted the MEPA process will not be over until the end of <br /> January, <br /> or1t I " ued perid I -n g art JL IL 2 IL <br /> to D ecemb r• JL 7 1 987 ZZ 3 0 Pern . <br /> � � 34 X <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.