10/29/1987 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes

Home Browse Search

Conservation Commission PaSe 80 October 29 , 1987 house. Dare Sa icki presenting* Ms Hanscom- advised they -could riot find the house lot or any staking i n order to do an on-site. Mr. Sanicki clarified the location , He advised there was correspondence between Mr. Tar belli , the builder, and John Var onda, earlier. DEQE was involved also ' in some of the conversations. Rather than request an amended order of conditions for a deck , John suggested the best procedure was to file an RDA. He assumed John had put ev r ►t in together re the original proposal . The house is newly completed. There was a miscommunication bet ween h i s office and the proposed house which was indicated to be rectangular in shape. ' When they built the house which was supposed to have a full cellar but due t-o where it -is cannot , they elevated the entire house, The oar i ginal . proposal was to put a deck on the second floor 1 X 20, which John felt was excessive and was cut to 10 X 2 . The side where the' deck - is proposed has a sliding door arrangement up in the airwhich they propose to utilize . . . Ms Behruan asked the location in re.l at i on' to the topography on the - plan. he - plan. Mr. Sana cki stated there is a difference of one foot away from the marsh. They are proposing three sono tubes '8 feet off the building to support the deck above with a stairway parallel with the house. Ms- Behr.aan -%;,zs,k-ed if a Certificate of Compliance -was issued on -t: e house -and lir. Sani ck i stated he was not sure if one was issued . r sought. MsBehrman stated this was a procedural problem whether the Commission should be considerinS this. Mr . Sanicki stated the reason being done this way is that it was John ' s opinion to come hack for .art --& r-. Rosenberg pointed out the Commission would be left with a prior - filing which will nearer have a Certificate of Compliance . Mr . Sa i k i stated the- certificate will be . requested at such time as the land.scap- i g and everything is in order. Mr. # o nberg questioned how there ovula be two certificates.- both in relation to, a single family dwelling. -Mr.. Sanicki explained that is the rason for an RDA which does not get a certificate, Mrs. Jacobson pointed out that -would only apply to a negative f i g, Ms Behrman stated she would be more comfortable with a modification o an existinS order of conditions , Mr. Rosenberg suggested they Set a modified plan on the old filing; get the certificate of compliance based on the -modified plan approved y the commission and at the same time , if the commission is s inclined , issue a negative determination on the neva application. Ms Behrman suggested the deck be included as part of the modified plan and modify the order of conditions to include the deck , The c rti ficate would thea cover everything. She noted the Order ofCon- ditions was amended on 3/6/87 . Mr . San i k i requested the oomm i ss i on if desired , amend Lhe order rather than address it as an RDA. Mr . Rosenberg stated this cannot be done as it was not advertised .