Laserfiche WebLink
Conservation <br /> - Conserv Commission •' . <br /> January 28 . 1988 <br /> Page 4.. - <br /> Y <br /> and will try to provide some documentation. Mrs. Jacobson added, and <br /> cleaning . out the river. <br /> Ms eh m n stated, for ;the �rainage Issue, Mr. i gil must be satis- <br /> ied, not gust t'he. Coniiission and DEQE must also be satisfied. Sh,e <br /> j further stated s,az thing was said about administrative penalties,, <br /> Mr. Kirrane asked, as it relates t E. ' it iIiobreakdown, - Is it the <br /> ommissi n' s position that t is Mfr . Sullivan' s responsibility to core <br /> up with $25, 000 to rectify that or is the Commission suggesting that <br /> t least a portion of that should be borne by his client? It appears <br /> that some of the things .talked about are things that may not necess- <br /> arily <br /> ecess- <br /> ari1 relate to anything that his client has done and may relate to <br /> other conditions caused by the development, <br /> Ms Behrman stated Town Counsel would have to be conferred with before <br /> . .the Board could make any suggest ons O <br /> Mr. Kirran <br /> ' stated h-e has been told that some of the siltation results <br /> Cave the water f l owing from the pond itself. <br /> Ms Bhaan stated in the course of several visits where this was - occur; <br /> as - occur, <br /> ''Ang and directly upstream of that drain the water was absolutely clew <br /> Innediatelry downstream of that drain it looked I ike Cafe Ole. . �.. <br /> r# Kirran asked if the width of the river s i ' moves downstream <br /> y <br /> has an bearing. s. eh a' n stated it 'did not. She adv*sed .the osm- <br /> 0. " <br /> fission would confer i it 'Town Counsel 4nd Mr,,- it ilior on"t'h# ' document. <br /> She stranaly suSgested Mro. Sullivan satisfy DEQED <br /> 7: 30 - Charles M. Talania►n (Holmes & McGrath) To construct and mintai' <br /> i walkway, +4' X 0' tim e. pier, . ' X 12' timber ramp and ' X 10' <br /> a back ►* - ,. � rices -. <br /> 'float a ckway Bay Road. '.Tod- alm ant r er present in, butter � <br /> were mai*led ,Januar 0 but not 'return <br /> ed# receipts from the conti�nt�ed <br /> hearing - ofJanuary :7' were presented. <br /> Mr. Palme <br /> n t i er stated Lot 9. is located at the end of aCul de. Sac ' , <br /> largely on a coastal bank with an area of salt marsh, <br /> Lisa advised that because of the revisions, the Board requested .a neer <br /> hearing on the house, the pool has been taken away. Ms Behruan asked <br /> if a Certificate of Compliance has been issued on the house. lir. <br /> almntier stated there is a superceding order for the hoose which has <br /> not been done. The first part of the proposal is a -brick walkway 3 ft. <br /> wide on a sand base down to the point of the coastal bank where there <br /> will be a brick patio 1 ' - 1 ' . From the pati <br /> o2 o2 the pier will begin <br /> ' wide supported on 4N. X 40 posts to be hand .g4 and placed by hand. <br /> Across the marsh, the posts will probably be ted from a bargeat <br /> high tide. The ' X ' ramp will be attached at the end of the pier <br /> resting on an 10' float. At the Board of Appeals hearing the Con <br /> Servati-on Agent expressed concern that the pier was located too close <br /> to the eroding portion of the coastal bank; her point being disturbance <br /> f vegetation in that area would further destabilizi9the bank andI ace <br /> sent 'of the piles would cause further disturbance , She suggested the <br /> peter be ,moved down- the bank and angled, <br /> 5 <br />