5/5/1988 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes

Home Browse Search

Conservation Commision May 5, 1988 Page 2. this with the Engineer. Nor, Coffey asked if the wall shows evidence the sand will perc through it, Mr. Lundgren stated there was less than a one minute perc for the septic, the entire lot is sand. Nis Behrman asked what would be done around the footing of the wall where erosion is taking place. Mr, Lundgren stated they did not propose to do anything as the Engineer did not feel it was a situation to be concerned about. They would be willing to punt down fescue and rye to rveetate disturbed areas. Ms Behrman suggested Blueberries, huckleberries or wintergreen as ground covers. She expressed concern that if there is a wet spell , there will be percolation with sand coring out of the wall ; it will destabilize the slope. The Commission would want a re veget tion plan around the base of the wall filed with the Comm- iion for approval Mr. Lundgren was advised that all information is to be sent to DE E. HEARING CLOSED UPON RECEIPT of REVE ETATION PLAN. 7:45 - Robert Brandwein - All cape Survey Consultant. continued from 4/14168. To construct an addition to a single family dwelling, to include a new septic system at 233 Hooppo l e Road. Chris costa presenting. Abutter receipts were presented with four undeliverable and seven received for a total of eleven. The mailing list was reviewed a-nd it was noted there were 47 abutters on the list. 1r. Rosenberg suggested the hearing be held open subject to the receipt of slips to indicated a full ailing. Nor. costa agreed. Mr, Costa stated the work is in the buffer zone within 100 feet of the pond. A poured concrete foundation is proposed for the addition of wood frame con- struction. ith the foundation to be reshrubbed and flowers planted to cover area disturbed. No contour changes are proposed. Haybales are proposed even with the back of the deck. The septic system will be upgraded to Title v; it is substandard now being closer than 100 feet to the well . Mrs. Ferriday pointed out that drywe l 1 s in the Notice of Intent are not shown on the plan. Mr. Costa stated they are existing but there will be no problem with putting in new dry ells. Lisa asked if Board of Appeals approval was received and Mr. costa stated he was not sure that was necessary as this is not a new dwelling, Lisa stated this would stili have to go through Board of Appeals. Mr. Costa stated they would cross that bridge as they came to it, Ms Behrman advised this is required before conservation Commi sss ion action, Mr. costa requested a continuance. He indicated on the plan where the dells are located and where the new one will be put in and initialed it. Gregg Willis, representing Mr, Brandwein, questioned the Board of Appeals situation and stated work is to be started after the summer. HEARING CONTINUED PENDING BOARD of APPEALS ACTION AND RECEIPT of ABUTTERS RECEIPTS.