6/2/1988 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes

Home Browse Search

Conservation Commission Meeting of June 2, 1988 Page 2. Harold Cohen - Cont. : n order of Conditions was approved in 1987 with a lot of fill and recontouring which expired in 1986* No DEQE number was assigned. Paul Lelito submitted an environmental report and Board of Appeals issued a variance pending approval in location of structure within 50 feet of the wet- land edge. Board of Health approved pending Conservation approval . The structure is going to be on piles due to veing in the flood zone. It is going to be four feet above existing grade on a pile foundation. A gravel driveway is proposed. Mrs. Ferriday stated the house should be roved to allow more distance, lr. eAskill stated he told Mr. Cohen that the impact, with the size of the project, was too big. They discussed chopping off some of the parts and eliminating driveways and Mr. Cohen agreed; he was concerned about the dock, but had no problem with eliminating the guest house. He advised the house is two story with three bedrooms. Nor. McAskill agreed to slide the house back 15 feet. He felt that some of the driveway could be li inated as well as the 'IT" section of the house. 1 . Rosenberg stated fill and regarding might not be necessary then. CONTINUED TO JUNE 16, 1988 - 8:00. 8:30 - Stratford Ponds Egerton Development For a residential development of 160 units including a 'culvert. Carl Gra setti and Laurel McKelrey presenting. letter -dateJune 2 was read into the record stating the dredging of Amos Pond was deleted from the Notice of Intent. They request approval of a roadway cross- ing to include a 24 inch reinforced concrete culvert at station 4+00 on High St. and also installation of a 24 Inch reinforced concrete pipe- at station 9+90. They request that all conditions listed on pages 12 through 25 be made ars order of Conditions as discussed with Lisa Hanscom and Laurel McKelrey be rade respon- sible espon- sible in the field for protection and implementation of all above mentioned in an Order of. Conditions. Also, dames Ingram of Bartlett Tree Co.as consultant in the removal of necessary vegetation to perform this work and give assistance in performing all wetland revegetat i on. Mr, Gras. etti further stated the impact of the original Notice of Intent has been greatly reduced in density and takes all of the structures but one out of the buffer zone. The Planning Board ended up with a restricted clearing line which will be flagged and will be the work limit line. The work is consolidated. As time goes on, if the reed arises, they will come back in to talk about dredging. There is an old wooden sluice which will be removed; pipe will be dropped in on clean stone with clean stone on top of it. Mr. Ingram will be involved with the removal of trees and with what is replanted. Mrs. Ferriday asked if replication will take place at the same time. Laurel stated it would be and they will be using the same materials. They will remove the top 10 inches of organic ratter in the wetland area they are disturbing; stockpile i t; using 't as a nursery area adjacent to the proposed replication area which is low lying. Another 5 inches beneath will be used as the base for the replicated area. 1r. Grassetti stated a crane will be used, staying totally on the upland, with boom that can swing out, go down, and surgically remove the stock and bring material in. There will be a botanist physically there as the work goes on. Laurel will be there when the work is being done.