My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6/30/1988 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
>
6/30/1988 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/16/2018 5:11:57 PM
Creation date
2/16/2018 3:24:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
CONSERVATION COMMISSION
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
06/30/1988
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r <br /> Carol Jacobson - Simply document in ter i t i rig that your fare i l has been <br /> doing this since 1 � 4 <br /> Mr. Baker r - Do we have to stop work while we are waiting? <br /> Louise and members - No, you can continue wor i n . <br /> South Cape Beach Association <br /> At beginning of hearing Mr . Ernest Virgiljo stated that he wants copies <br /> f nates because the Commission's decisions cou l'd cause him irreparable <br /> harm and may cause him to seek legal action . <br /> Robert Gauthier - Gave a history of the ramp and floats from October <br /> 1956 whex they first met with John Varkonda. They have a floating ramp <br /> at this time, and are now at low tide, <br /> Louise -� You're saying that John ' ar� on da said that if it was a series <br /> of floats riot attached to the shore, it would not come under the Con. <br /> .Com.? <br /> Mr . Gauthier presented minutes from the 10./86 meeting. Floating walk <br /> goes on to floating ramp . The float measure 18' . The al a;/ is <br /> X 45 it . long. <br /> Chet Kobl i ns y - I gave Mr. Gauthier the permit . I have come down a <br /> because I understand Mr. Gauthier has had a threatiening letter from the <br /> Con , Cori. to remove the float r. face a fine of $1 ,000C l gave him th,? � <br /> permit for the float - the ramp is also a floating ramp . These core <br /> under my jurisdiction, not Conservation , They did have a plank leading <br /> to the float, which they have admitted, but they did remove the plan E <br /> and everything i on the water at thistime . <br /> a <br /> Louise asked how the walkway was supported. ' <br /> Che - It is supported by st rof oam floats and held by mushroom anchors. <br /> Lisa I have checked with Coastal Zone Management and talked with Jack <br /> Clark, talked with DEE and Barbara Langley who is Wetland En4orcement , <br /> Agent for the Dept . All said that xou did have to go through the <br /> application with the Wetland Protection Act because it was anchored on <br /> the bottom of land under ocean . I have asked DEGE to send rye a copy of <br /> the regulations, <br /> i <br /> lr. Gauthier - That"s from low tide i n , is it not? <br /> Lisa - No, this is out to 80 feet , Because it is anchored to the <br /> bottom, it is applicable to the [Wetlands Prot , Act , I will give cop t es <br /> o everyone when I receive the regs. <br /> Frank Venuto - Your (Con , Com. ) letter iridicater the float shall be <br /> removed or we would pav a fine ; that it was supposed to be removed <br /> within ~seeks of receipt cif the letter, <br /> a� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.