7/28/1988 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes

Home Browse Search

Conservation Commission July , 1988 Page 3. Ms. Be rman stated the Commission asked for a plan, not just the pho ow stats of the area of the base. A Prague verbal description of the area in the park which is town property was given. r--.-:_-,Murray stated, you. would,, need a plan as well as a.. meets. and. bounds t-ge description. The Commission agreed. Ms Behrman. stated the Commission had asked. for- some type of coni-to-ring . program; what- water quality in f rm-at i on they had. Col . Br gna stated the water quality discussed in January , What was offered- i-n the July Ist correspondence and what is proposed here '-for-. the rest of the calendar- year -will address each of the 3 or -4 separate r i butarg areas along w1ith the present information that we have for the main distribution 1 ine down to- the pond and add all this inform- i onp o provide you with thebulk o the.. in foaati on that you are trgs to ascertain. Whether are h.ae one o . four areas, running. into st., it -is all going to flog down the same aairktrunk line. ghe ewe. have -the monitoring well 515. teat E,C, Jordan installed, last year with .t.he. fiveL separate ,.rounds of -sampling between. April -of 987. . r. 1 ,Rosenberg:-But we haven' t. seen any -of it. It.' s in here, -air~. .. Ms Behrman asked i f the lopnitoring well was- 50 feet deep. - Col V.I Brogna stated'. it.. -.is- a five well cluster._-., s Be .raan. .stat .d .that-. does not: adAres . the surface ground, we. speelific-ally.. asked for sur face- .runo f f.- -Co]. Bro na stated. -t-he information.ln-- the -.Ju.ly-.1---carr spondee . is the cne::.-:.and: or ly -s-et -of . results-.d'one two- .gears- ago.. We gave you. the, results. hese.. in-.-- the"_p ckage. ,E e- thJLng -was.--clean andr- they wiII- be- :--re sagP lin -4 days...from now for .the Jul g-#august amp l i ng period and 4--V-'.-.takes---1---4 weeks. for results He- -advised. the -samples were taken: to the right of- the. road situation upstream. from the oil-water separator* Mr-. . Rosenberg stated- upstream does not he-1p; it is needed on the other i 's.ide of. the separator.. i Col . , Br o na- stated if - it comes - out -with a.. non-detect there and. e erg- tKir - else is down gradient from. it, everything in here: has to stay. dean. - There. are no other tributary. areas, .this . is all airfie-Id, Ms Be roan asked what is coming out of the separator. From. all the descriltions we have had in the past,, the separator is6 contributing to the unaff and we have been told itys going to be replaced by a much arger one, more adequate aduate for what's going on. - -It is unknown.- when -the . � replacement willtake place and concern. is for what i coming out the s parato.r now, that's, what is going into the pond Col. Brogna state : g d he isnot o-ing. to . st and. corrected. on i , but maybe h : ai dr- the wrong thing. . He did not think it prudent for anyone to sag the sampling is at or above the separator. Normally.: at least the sag 1 in the are doin now, is at or, downgradient from the surface P g g g effluent o f the separator. That i s being done with the new contract Ms Behreana4 uested a plan reflecting past, current and future sampling sites to clarify the situation.