7/28/1988 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes

Home Browse Search

Conservation Commission -July 28, 1988 Page 2. Col. E rogna advised utilities must be hooked. up to provide for storm- drainage; sanitary sewer con-nections and a water system for the new facility. They are talking square footage for the new building, re impervious cover, minus what we take e away and any alterations to the parking area. Theoretically, the parking space requirements will not -change a great deal , there will not be an expansion of people or- .vehicles. Mrs. Simmons asked Col. B ogna to demonstrate on the map they seat. Mr. Rosenberg pointed out that a recordable map was needed, what has been received is photostats with something drawn in. The Commission does not have a complete map of the area being discussed. , .There is statement identifying three substantial areas as potential hazardous waste sites within areas -which may contribute or influence .-the runoff to-. the drainage . easement; a.. coal storage and ash disposal -area.;-. a coal, -and. ash pile runoff; -and-= an aircraft maintenance storm drainage ditch. The--Commission has no information on- what effect these areas mould h air e. Col. Brogna stated they.' . do not have a- new - site plan , far the new con--. st action het because it has. not been designed* They know, from the scope of the work, there will be a new facil-it ; renovations to an ex- i-sting faci i and there wl l t be the. deaol ition - f bu ldi.ngs--th -t.% -are used now. but. wi 11 -..not be used after -the conversion program ris- complete* What the- actual.- square- foctage, change will b,e.- to. compute =impervious cover, has not- off i c i al l y .been. determined -yet. It will be once the en-gineering f1ra -finals .es, their site. development work. They do -know, from the . square footage point- of vi.ew,- their., are not ,-going to be in- 'creasing anything ign-ifcan-.tl ---with the F-15 becaus-e....they .-are not authorized, �t :fir.. Rosenberg stated the impervious area is not the only problem. We have a problem with ' the various areas which could, be, and you. have .identified thee# as possibly contributing or ,influencing the runoff; hazardous waste influencing the- runoff into- the drainage ditch with no .information to the Coanission concerning it& Going war back to the original zeetin8, there was .-the sane prod es, when. Mr. Orlow was here. It was suggested, -let's dor- it. in the form of a license with a= pro .- is-ion for nonitoring wells- and periodic reports so that so long as the drainage area remains clean. : they would have a license but -if you- dome up with a seri-annualreport showing hazardous waste., as defined by either the State or Federal , law, being dumped in there. and this drain- -a a -ditch -runs night. -,dorm into the pond; - i f that happens a r will g have. to be:- .foundr ' o eliminate.-. that or. t stop the drainage a The oa is i s i on does not want to stop thea or get into a f i ght but on. the other and neither party knows the answerse r hen talking about an easesent, onceg.iven to them,, the Commission is out the window, no matter what happens there. As Behrman stated this was asked for a long time ago, the day after the first. hearing; a list of items for which information was requested and was agreed to by lir. Orlon. The only response was a series of p tele hone cabs at her home and place f work demanding to know if the license had been signed, He did come up with a draft license which was totally inadequate and did not address any of the Commission's .concerns.