Laserfiche WebLink
Conservation- Commission <br /> August 11 , 1988. <br /> Page 6.. <br /> revised plans which were presented, The swimming pool <br /> to. line is ran normal t � was moved back <br /> the- property lire to the 4 edge, of the .new <br /> addition. The whirlpool has been Put inside the pool <br /> mains the game. The p � Size- re. <br /> -I patio -apron is--the same, feet, to be con... <br /> structed of concrete which is. the prefere' n' ce of the i n <br /> � � and pec- - <br /> ommended' bar t .e -pool- company. - <br /> Ms Behrman suggested wood, she expressed concern for the runoff - toward <br /> the bark, <br /> Mr. Palmatier requested the Commission recon , <br /> seder their--request.. for <br /> drwe l: - for .,.the pool, as there 'is no. room due to Title V requirements. <br /> Fir. Burns stated, in other words, -the house is too lar <br /> e for tie lot, <br /> Mr:,. Rosenberg asked if they weren' t ` <br /> gong over 0% increase <br /> - <br /> r. Palmatier stated that's not -ther <br /> p plrigt now, that :. been - <br /> approvted-.�.... The- pool is, what 's- being proposed and the patio <br /> . '� The <br /> has been <br /> reduced froom - the o .sinal proposal . The area ?for the runoff does not <br /> seem a. ,lot' considering-9--only a 4 foot-.wide pati o# -'.Mr..:: ey. <br /> asked the <br /> surface.--area. with -the patio-, and= was; told 160, arm- feet <br /> Ms Behrman stated in. addition to • <br /> the cumulate effect from the resp <br /> of:-the structure on the jot. <br /> r -Rosenbe rS asked where the water, f rom the colis of <br /> . - na and was -, --. <br /> told-.-they. don't. put rt water unless . it's ang. emergency, then they put. <br /> it on the road. <br /> Ms Behrman stated it ,cannot a assumed the pool. cowp an <br /> is Lto _, <br /> drain-, into the road. <br /> Mr. Palmatier stated Mr. CariSlia would not want to consider <br /> adrain- <br /> age easement; the only other consideration would be a drywell under <br /> the driveway with a piping facility, <br /> OTE: Lotion} ■ad . and:--seconded -to ask for Plans detaili-ng a dr e <br /> y ll . <br /> If. not received, the Commission will act in the Order of <br /> Conditions accordigly. <br /> Mr. Coffey stated, on the issue of the concrete patio he would like <br /> to see a case made that it ' s not more detrimental than a pervious deck. <br /> He would like more information on how it's going to effect what <br /> is <br /> around i t, pro l UMe, square footage; something other than we' d rather <br /> see it drain through the cracks* _ <br /> Mr . Palmatier asked, if he cones back with a proposal far deck, `�s <br /> that going to be suitable, s- ahrman stated a wooden deck would be <br /> much more desirable. Mr. Palmatier suggested sloping theP atio in <br /> both directions. Ms Behrman stated they cannot make runoff on the <br /> abutting lot. <br /> Mr. Rosenberg stated the Commission cannot retie i n this for h ' <br /> m. <br /> HEARING CONTINUED PENDING RECEIPT OF INFORMATION. I F ADEQUATE, <br /> TO E CLOSED. HEARING <br />