Laserfiche WebLink
Conservation omm.i ss i on <br /> November 1 , 1988 <br /> 'age 1 . <br /> Sant it Woods Limited Partnership",- Lit ' Shields Road. A 610 <br /> wide path through the 'work limit -is necessary for the-installation o <br /> the well . There is a ' ,vegetated' buffer par�alle o the wetland. -It <br /> is 160 feet from the edge o the . wetland dor -the septic,. 674 cu._ids.. <br /> of clean sand is to be used 'for a gentler slope of three to one-. <br /> siltation fence will 'be considered. -- <br /> Mrs. <br /> rs. Simmons stated ha bales should be put around. the well access. Ms <br /> Baylog asked why.. Lisa stated to keep the tru k,-om route. Ms Baylos <br /> agreed- and 'stated they w.111 pr6bably have to bui lel _a ramp fir"the- <br /> truck to get down there. Access , for the well in back will require r - ' <br /> grading. 'She felt this could be ,reduced Somewhat, 'Jhe driveway Ls to <br /> be of crushed clean stone. All disturbed areas to be mulched and. <br /> planted, <br /> Ms Behrman suggested moving the grouse cep closer.. to the mad so that <br /> the amount of fill -would not be necessryt <br /> Ms B ylo`g stated with the 40' road setback, they cannot pull much <br /> closer wit iiVoting it,. 1t. has to be set back from Nabska and Shields <br /> . Road. <br /> s ' ehrman asked if it coul-d ,be ki tycorn'ered and Ms Baylog stated ' it <br /> t <br /> could be; .hopefully, there would not be a .prpblem with the septic. <br /> Ms Behrman stated klttycorn re , all you' d have to do wold. be the <br /> holding tank which can be e l ocat d and still have room for the <br /> septic. <br /> sto stated it might look better. e ' cold try i , but have the <br /> y g <br /> feeling we played with that . <br /> Ms Behrman stated she would l it e F to sea what . rou ld ' happen. In the <br /> past, where the Board has looked at similar situations', the o x's! has <br /> suggested they go to the Board of Appeals for a variance o move them <br /> away from a critical wetland area. <br /> Atty. Castignetti stated they will not g <br /> t the hoard o - eat. , not <br /> now. <br /> Ms Behrman asked, ate , y u-,{saying you are not willing t <br /> Atty. as ig <br /> nett stated that' s 'correct, we wi4l l not o to the Zoning <br /> , - - <br /> Board of Appeal-s for a variance at this ti�n�e . Lf there were a case <br /> where e' Frerefilling a wetland and i#t were a- part i cu l a tissue- where <br /> the Commission were in a position oaf denying the filling of tyre <br /> wetland and that kind of 4 thing and we were pressed ,from that _ <br /> perspective, I think we would consider it, but under the present <br /> filing we would not. <br /> s <br /> ehrman stated as far as any other questions she has, all of the <br /> other questions and points of information that were requested on the <br /> two previous hearir s toni ht including the delineation of theland <br /> subject' to flooding amply here. <br /> Mrs. Jacobsonstated there- <br /> one di f erenc in this lot in that 674 <br />' cul yds. is planned, double b1e the amount of, fill - on the other ores, <br /> rma t will a an interesting runoff pattern on what <br /> s� Leh n stated t �re _ <br /> isn' t that one o our Tots <br /> we believe is town property. She asked, <br />