My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11/10/1988 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
>
11/10/1988 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/21/2018 5:03:58 PM
Creation date
2/21/2018 12:43:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
CONSERVATION COMMISSION
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
11/10/1988
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Conservation. Commission <br /> - November 10, A988 <br /> -Fuge 1 . <br /> Ms, Behrman speaking, continued: the-ire. what yo'u' re doing' is <br /> changing the runoff pattern so ..tori property may be' impacted. we could <br /> get an erosion situation also'. Baylog agreed this was possible-. - <br /> Mr. Coffey stated, if contours are going to be modifie{d, they should <br /> all, be treated the sAme way, <br /> Pyr. Lindholm stated he would .like to be- clear on the grading issue, <br /> has additional information been requested? <br /> Lisa stated the Commission would like to know the erosion effects from <br /> the fill , they are changing the topography. How are they going to <br /> stabilize it to prevent erosion from entering the wetland and <br /> impacting gn abutting lots? <br /> Pointing to the plan, Ms Behrman stated, - your current dflaknage <br /> direction is this way`, your proposed fill is going to funnel runoff <br /> that way.' You ire changing your impacts there and changing 'the <br /> direction of water _and poten�tiall'y ausi.n impact on the .abutting <br /> property. This is in the resource area and l think we have legitimate <br /> concerns. <br /> Mr. Lindholm stated. -so-,yo'u want an under'stan'ding of runoff at 'this <br /> point here. Ms Behiman added, and the amount of runoff' going 'do'wn <br /> there. <br /> Mrs. Jacobson stated, or, if there was a consideration of less fill on <br /> the combination -of the three lots. <br /> r <br /> Ms Behrman stated if <br /> they could change the angle f the house they <br /> could' pull the bulge- out. <br /> Ir. Lindholm asked if that -was being made a condition. Mr. Burns <br /> stated no, that' s Just information, <br /> Ms Behrman asked, can you come up with someth ing l i ke that -that works? <br /> If not, we' 11 consider the application as it is. I am suggesting t <br /> you it is possible to lessen the impacts on the site by changing the <br /> angle of the structure and putting down ' the amount. of fill .' Again, in <br /> this area, it will be interesting to -.,see what the land subject -to ',."., <br /> flooding lines are, <br /> Mr. Lindholm stated Way, -but- more specifically* in teams of the <br /> impact on the Wetland Act , in terns of drainage is the major consider- <br /> ation erosion? <br /> Lisa stated yes, again, everything that was on' the other two' . <br /> Mr. Lindholm stated in addition to , the five other . ndit#ons, the - <br /> topics of additional information w discussed at the o her two lots, <br /> which has come up at tis lot is we want an understanding o . the <br /> drainage at this point`,, Ms Behrman added, and any mitigating -measurwe <br /> proposed to be undertaken to cut down the impact. <br /> lir. Lindholm stated, if there' s a spot condition there. Okays, I under- <br /> stand. <br /> Ms Behrman stated and is it possible to change the angle o,f the house } <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.