Laserfiche WebLink
Conservation Commission <br /> November IQ, 1988 <br /> Pace 1 . <br /> 5 <br /> and cut down that vast amount of filIT Again, I would Like to know <br /> where it' s coming from and- how compatible. -. <br /> Mr. Lindholm stated fIrst, what that does, it ' s, ch nsing this f i-.1 ing. <br /> 4 <br /> It' s ScinS to get into how much -of -a revision can be made to this <br /> filing. <br /> Ms Behrman stated it can' be modified. <br /> Ms Baylog stated in the past the C6mmission has accepted new site <br /> locations. <br /> . LindhoIM stated h understood `what the concerns -are about -the <br /> s'l o p e. �. <br /> Lasa asked if they were i - agree ent to continue this hearing's <br /> Atty. Castinetti asked if h6 could ask a question befor.e the hearing <br /> is closed . Mgrs . Simmons advised the hearing i . not being closed and <br /> invited him to ask. <br /> A -ty# Castignetti st-at d, these Notices of Intent have been pending o <br /> a . r-equested continuance for over a year long period based on an issue. <br /> involved in so-me sand and. water, rig is that required some le al <br /> research which they nd�ert oK in responding- to the Torn and it has not <br /> been mentioned tonight ,, nor have they r ceiv d - a response from the <br /> Town. e- would like to know if the Camaission will offer a response <br /> based on in f ormat i on they prov i ded t o- the Town so they may - know where <br /> that issue stands right now. <br /> Mrs. Simmons stated Tour Counsel _wi I I be asked to send them a letter . <br /> Lisa stated the issue was sent to Town Counsel and he is in the <br /> process of Setting a letter out. <br /> Ms Baylot asked if this was being considered a continuati -of the -old <br /> !nearing of a year ago prior to the bylaw. is it being heard under the <br /> bylaw and the Wetland Protection Act. She wanted to make sure it' s, not <br /> -just under the Wetland Protection .Act since it was just originally <br /> .led under the Wetland Protection Act. i <br /> Ms <br /> : r an advised the! Commission. has al ay had a bylaw and that was <br /> why two Orders were issued . Now one is given fo;r both. <br /> CONTINUED TO DECEMBER 1 - 8: 15, <br /> 9'145 - Pak Lam Tam (Arrow Engineering Inc. ) For the construction <br /> of a. r a ent stairway and seasonal pier and .float in MashPee <br /> Pond off of Sturgis Lane i #ashp e. George:- Thorn presentinS Stai rw <br /> wi I I b ' x ' , posts CCA treated, on 8 Sn --tu-bes. The dock wi 1 I <br /> .extend flout ' into Mashpee Pond ,;on 5 sections, T 2 pipes will be, <br /> installed in the pond. The floats and the dock will be removed -at h -% <br /> end �of the -season and stored upland. The plan , w ; approved - y the, 4 <br /> Board of Appeals. + <br /> it had + , so o l n <br /> r•s.� Jacobson asked4.i f There was any reason ' <br />