Laserfiche WebLink
Conservation Commission <br /> December 15,. .1988 <br /> Page 10. <br /> Pay+-e .i'ok stated that is whys they did away with the sonotubes and. . <br /> went with a, paiio, on grade. The idea being t -match the existing Grade <br /> so that the flood storage volume Mould be maintained because if they----- <br /> bring <br /> er::.brin anythin ..,above grade.,.�...it' s. ecrea In -the flood storage vol <br /> Mr. Rosenberg stated. no it wouldn't If the patio - is above- grade, the: <br /> water can run right underneath i t. Ir, Page i i ck stated i t. -d i sp l ace's a.,.- <br /> certain act . ' .. water, and- Mr.- Rosenberg stated not -.i f the water . can..,.., <br /> run underit, . r. Pavel ion stated. i f - the. sonotubes are pref err grey;;,,... <br /> can do- that, <br /> Mr. Rosenberg- stated- he did not care what was put under there. If they.-' . <br /> are Soing to run this at this level , � their have to have stairs coming <br /> down either, here or.- here.. - <br /> r. Rosenberg stated- he was the one to raise the issue. On the-.= <br /> ori,sina plan- this deck was to - be at- the - save-- level as- the. addition <br /> and this pati is lower... two. steps down-.,.. Mr. Jacobs, stated there- Ka S.-. <br /> to be a -transition between the, deck-,' . r... senber ...stated, that. was. al I... <br /> ri +ht dust show where the- transition., is. 8oin -to be.. ..l _. uMpi,ng, of f- -.''. <br /> here , it' s going to be into the swat e. Mr. Jacobs stated they would <br /> make it between the decks. Mfr. Rosenberg stated to keep it up high nd <br /> make it over here. The only thing the commission doesn' t want is an <br /> excavation. r. Jacobs stated that was all they wanted to know. The <br /> transition will be between the two decks. Mr. Rosenberg stated- that <br /> would be fine as lon8 as it is over where the deck and patio meet and <br /> as long as the patio is this size and- the deck that size rather than <br /> the double size shown on here. <br /> i <br /> Mr. Pa lick stated they- could. submit -a revised plan arid-. asked,. if <br /> everyrthin else ret .with th-e board" s approval? <br /> Mrs. Simmons asked if there was any consideration to a . reduct i ori. i n .L-., <br /> size on the addition, he was to have Sone back to the owners... <br /> Mr. Jacobs asked how much of a- reduction was requested. The addition...-, -' <br /> is basically 5' x 25' , there' s a 4' transition between the house <br /> because there' s a flat roof. [yrs. Jacobson stated,. but theme' s. space, .-: <br /> in there: -Mr. Jacobs stated there was room . for- a refrigerator or .. <br /> met i n .-. <br /> 1r* Pavelick stated they r got the- required variance . for the lot, <br /> coverage. <br /> Mr. ,Jacobs agreed to ask the, owners to cut it back ' from the <br /> direction, of the water. <br /> [fir. Rosenberg stated upon receipt of a revised plan the comissio <br /> will act upon i t. <br /> Mr. Pavelick stated. tey will have a deck above grade set on sonotube <br /> foundation. <br /> Mr. Rosenberg stated._ a deck on whatever foundation. they like b V_aV'..'.: <br /> the same level as - the. existing. . <br /> There were no comments frois the public, <br /> TO BE CLOSED UPON RECEIPT OF REVISED PLANS A <br />