12/15/1988 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes

Home Browse Search

Conservation Commission December 15, 1988 Page 11 . 8: 01 Joseph Gari lia, 520, Triton Way, deck additions Abutter_, receipts dere presented.. Todd Palmat i er presenting. The hearing was continued. to allow theis to pro ide� the information- requestedw .-They have .-located.- - the existing retaining wall whish is entirely on Lot 520, albeit right . on the line. They. also did. additional to ra hic surrey and included.. to o beyond, the swimming pool on lot. 521 and continued. to the patio , on,,,-- lot ri;,,-- 1of 520. Mr. Burns- asked- where -the patio is for- -this s iv ing oo.I .-.I,.-.. Ctrs. Simmons stated, lit was over the lot.. line. Mr.. - Burns stated it is.. right in the middle of the wall . Mr, P lmatier agreed this was correct., and was supported by the wall. Mrs. Siveons asked if that was legal", Mr. egal" - r. Rosenberg stated it - is zero lot 1 ine,.. you can'-t go over the lob line without permission. He.. asked i.f ...th.e . have per issi n?.. stated:.-.-:.,- ti - is an issue -for the. owner , of th ... .houe. Mr. Palmatier stated one off.. the concerns was for. drainage due to the''-- regrading of lot 521 and how. that would impact the coastal, bank. There will be no runoff around the retaining wall . The area up here around--.. the swimming pool has been levelAed off. The retaining wall retains the dirt as well as the water . Underneath the deck is all crushed stone and any runoff from the deck will percolate through the crushed stone. The only water shed area is shown. 'vegetation along the coastal bank does not show. A funnel will act as a s ale to direct water away from the coastal bank. Mrs. Simmons pointed to a concrete waterway which. empties right onto. the reserved area. Mr. Burns advised a dog .has been creating a path down and a fence. - should be installed. Pers. Simmons asked what is. going .to protest the s imising pool and. was- told as- tol a fence, there no.w built on.- top of the desk. She. asked. if the - ,. Cedar tree could be sacred? Pyr. P lmatier stated it couldn' t. . Pyr. o-senberg asked if the.- existing- patio and- proposed patio- are. to- be.q. at different heights. r-q Palmatier stated- it is less than two feet--. off the existing. - r ve etation plan was submitted with the filins6" He advised the proposed. ha rba,les are not necessary and the 5'- work- ,-, limit could be brought back. Mrs. Jacobson suggested- abaes be placed where -.the dog is running-,, down. Mr. Rosenberg questioned- the PVC pipe arrdq was told-. it was drainage ford the patio and has been- on the plans since Mr. Bolger owned the place - back in 1986. He does not believe anything. is -draining over the bank, it is very well egetat-ed,. HEARING CLOSED - ORDER OF CONDITIONS IN 21 DAYS. 8: 16 Gerald Epstein (New- Seabury Engineering)- RDA continued from December 1 , 1988. J-im Pavelick presenting, A letter was submitted from New Seabury Engineering. Concernins the outdoor shower, a letter from