My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/15/1988 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
>
12/15/1988 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/21/2018 5:05:35 PM
Creation date
2/21/2018 12:45:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
CONSERVATION COMMISSION
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
12/15/1988
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
servation Commission <br /> ,Oecemb r 1 , 1988 <br /> Page 2, <br /> Cir. Dittami stated he had no problem with that. He feels that is also <br /> somethins that , to make sure their permit is all to ether , should also <br /> be transmitted to the Planning Board. <br /> Mr. Rosenberg stated it should So both places. <br /> Mr. Dittami stated no, through the Commission as part of the review <br /> process the Commission will be making. <br /> Mr. Rosenberg stated they are askinS the Commission to issue aone- <br /> sentence statement, 'the wetland Protection Act is not applicable to <br /> this project" , based on the information you have given to use. If we <br /> have this document and these computations and we have the other in- <br /> form ation as to Whether or not the Act is applicable and the more in- <br /> formation we have, the better off. it is. <br /> Mr. Dittami agreed to leave a copy of the drainage plans with the <br /> Commissions <br /> Ms Behrman stated if in the course of deliberations of the Planning <br /> Board there should be a charge in the design, the Commission should be <br /> informed in writing of this. r. Dittami agreed.) Anything impacting <br /> these depressions or drainage systems. That is the only potential <br /> impact 1 see than we would be concerned with* <br /> ittam i stated there will be covenant that will prohibit site <br /> . . D 46 * wi11 <br /> clearing. For corsiderat.t n f the Planning Board, t' t covenant <br /> potenti.ially be in conflict with the request to donate a portion of the <br /> property ert o Route 28 . we have a 150 foot buffer in that area. This <br /> .will have to be resolved. <br /> There wer-s no c mers or questions * <br /> * 3 - John A. Sullivan, Lots 1 '15 Redwood Circle. <br /> Hetaring continued to December 15th at 7: 31 p . m. at the request of the <br /> applicant. <br /> xxx <br /> 7: 45 - Gerald S. Epstein, 45 wheelhouse Lane m . 1.I arwickTocon- <br /> struct and maintain a float extending 43 feet into Creat River. <br /> Scott McAskill advised Susan Asmus is due to appear and Inas the <br /> drawings, He stated there is an existing licensed dock and they are <br /> g <br /> proposing n additional identical' cal l float on the Northeast side <br /> � <br /> of the existing float. The abutting pier that Mr . Toyias has approved <br /> is 115 feet from the proposed line4k <br /> Concernina alternative ways of orientating the float, it was looked at <br /> and they feel this is the best solution. The Treason for the float i <br /> not for any additional boats, it s because fir-. O'Neill , an abutter, <br /> hasp oblems navi atln and was hitting r. Epstein' s boat* All that <br /> Mr. Epstein wants is to recenter his boat a little more to theorth-- <br /> asterly side . <br /> • <br /> Mr. Rosenberg stated once the Commission approved this, it does not <br /> make any difference who the owner of the property is , the Commission <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.