Laserfiche WebLink
Conservation Commission <br /> December ember l5, 1988 <br /> Page ;----- <br /> 7: 5 Barrer & Marcia Stone, 292 Compass Circleg Continued- from.. <br /> 12/1/88, Jim Pavelick of New Seabury Engineering and Charles Jacobs, <br /> the architect, presentin8. Revised plans. were subinitteds, At the last-.= <br /> hearing there was concern over whether or not the proper permits had <br /> been issued for. the- house and; existin8. dock. Copies of the building,-...,,. <br /> permit for the house granted, in 1964. were presented. In addition,- the. . <br /> existing dock was issued a license from the'- ACOE in 1971 and an , <br /> encumberance sheet from the- Registry of Deeds showiIng a license and <br /> plan. was filed- was.. included. <br /> [fir. Rosenberg asked if the. elevated. stairway was later? Mr. avelic :--. <br /> stated an order of conditions was issued for the existing elevated: <br /> stair a y T and d ei c - or 9/4/8'5-,-'DEQE #SE43� 5 l.- - p ' pre rated-...' <br /> Question was also 'raised as=Ao the t p-e of foundation - to be used.: for~ <br /> the addition and they have d o i de d to Sd .with -12"'-x - 12' -masonry' <br /> a�yrs <br /> In so doing, .the. float storage volume would -be--maintained. Instead of"' <br /> the' original - proposal , they are looking to ' use - just a 4"' frost Wal 1 I.-= <br /> with a slab on' grad a-. That would i'nv o 1 ve t a ing up that storage volume..,,., <br /> of the- addition. By constructing on 12" x 12" - piers, they. will -be_.-. <br /> running girders aross and joists. on:. top. <br /> Mr. Rosenberg er asked if they4i l i be up above ground zill the w <br /> Mr. Pavelick stated that was right. The garage will still be a slab. <br /> fie advised there is a partial basement under the house. <br /> Concerning the patio, Mr. Pavellek stated the original submission was <br /> for a deck based on the difference in elevation. They added the steps <br /> which are now shown on the plan which will come down to patio level <br /> all the way. across. The existing patio is wood. and he assumes the new... <br /> one will be wood also. They have added a buffer zone of p l ant l ags to.-ti. <br /> minimize runoff erosion. <br /> i <br /> Mr. <br /> oserber asl ed if they were proposing to excavate the patios fi e... <br /> elevation shown is below the existing grade line. He asked if they <br /> were going - to sink . the the patio below i3xistin8 grade? <br /> Mr. Pavelic� stated he was looking to maintain- the f�l od'- storage <br /> volutee.. b bringing it up above ' e is.tin . grade-- would be deor'easi g- the <br /> ,. <br /> volume'. <br /> Mrs. <br /> Simmons asked if the wood is going to sit right on- top of . the <br /> sand? Mr. - Jacobs stated they would have to- put a sub-base of some . <br /> ties. Mrs. Sinsons stated that is not shown. <br /> Mr. Fosenerg stated the show the existing grade up here, they' re <br /> showing the top <br /> of deck below existing grade and then a 6' bed off. . <br /> compacted- soil soil below it so it looks like they' re dissing out better <br /> than one foot o f <br /> existing material, Mr, Jacobs stated they have to di <br /> up something, no matter what they put in, <br /> sked if their put the wood decking down would that b <br /> Mrs. Jacobson a � � R <br /> sufficient so they don' t d1sturb the existing coyer that' s there rowst <br /> Jacobs- stated you have to put something on there, ,railroad ties . <br /> Jacobson- 'stated yes, but you u l dn.`t have to dig Up,­P­: :td!:-- <br /> pu . .. d: <br />