My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/15/1988 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
>
12/15/1988 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/21/2018 5:05:35 PM
Creation date
2/21/2018 12:45:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
CONSERVATION COMMISSION
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
12/15/1988
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
are talking about a 12m digging out here.. arwd-.... <br /> -base* This- plan- shows digging out, as h - sees., <br /> e existing. grade-. - <br /> was- r i- ht it-'s . t pica <br /> - comm'ission wants th to do and, Mrs.' ; <br /> istrbthe area. <br /> "We dory." t- want- the- area disturbed'. <br /> pati o is built. above- grade and Mr.. Jae bs.,. <br /> do here were at. the same Ievel as. the..-.,-,. <br /> ade <br /> he..- - <br /> de and put on - whatever posts or foundations.--. , <br /> g in there to hold it at the same grade, <br /> out. 12" area:. Mr-,-- Jacobs stated that . �s.:. .. <br /> Si.nally, they had proposed to put sono- tubes too <br /> Mr-.,-, s ober- stated- that was. all -right,. <br /> were told: that- was not- acceptable an v <br /> could not find that in the minutes. <br /> u l d prefer not to Pu. in this thing, he <br /> combination of a wood deck with two piles and <br /> c-Onnect it to this existing deck* . <br /> . <br /> t was the original. plan that was fried& <br /> registered engineer was on the.. plan.---and. spas...,,--- <br /> retained,.-a - a consultant. . <br /> s memory- on-, this spas-. the discus ion. . n -the size <br /> d, size of the proposed- additio-n. . The r were to <br />'s. they did and came- back with th a proposed deck.. <br /> 50% of the size c- . what we. objected. t *._. he . <br /> came cut over the edge of the. ,we-ti.and"I.- <br /> original plan, shows it was set back. 8 feet.:; <br /> tand,.. <br /> is is not 8 feet frow, the edge Of.- the wetland :-- <br /> stated, <br /> etland :..stated, at this point no& <br /> feet eras -wron . . e- went. cut- there, four .tiLme ,.. <br /> s. not 8 feet- Trois the wetlands w <br /> if you- look at this plan, this- new. deck. <br /> that., one. Mr. Pavelick stated they. o t ed,..- <br /> o 5 feet.. <br /> e difference between putting this deck on some <br /> m . evet as.., . ire: other...d-e -. and - .d in - this* - <br /> not., show on� this' plan.;- <br /> originally-, i t was. a ..deck, that, was plan d ..that._. <br /> d wn, from the additli on, it would have beer-:;.Ju-s - <br /> o ld have meaars elevation <br /> of two feet here <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.