Laserfiche WebLink
a <br /> Conservation Commission <br /> June , 9 , 1989 } <br /> Page 7. <br /> Mrs. Simmons stated her personal opinion is the pool in this plan is <br /> acceptable. Mr. Burns stated he has no problem with it. <br /> CHARLES ll EMBEI -- ORDER OF CONDITIONS: Nancy a)<i m was present <br /> while the revised plan was reviewed. Mr. Coffey read from the minutes <br /> Mr. Rosenberg stated the Commission cannot leaitimize something that <br /> was put on someone else' s land by Mr. Nirenberg. <br /> Ms Behrman was disturbed this was after the fact and saw no reason to <br /> permit the electrical work or flood lights. She moved that the Board <br /> require that all the utilities be removed and a vegetation plan <br /> showing dense native vegetation from the limit of :the fieldstone wall <br /> to the edge of the bank be submitted. <br /> There was general disagreement with the catch basin. <br /> Mrs, Marsters recalled one of the problems with the pool was that it <br /> was inthe reserve area, he was asked to move i t . If there was a <br /> catch basin, it wasn# t in this locionf } <br /> Ms Behrman stated nothing was said about a catch basin in the previous <br /> hearing. Ms DeKimpe stated she knows there were copies of plans with <br /> the basin and Ms Behrman stated they were never submitted to the <br /> Board,. - <br /> Mr. <br /> ar . _Mr. Coffey asked what other mitigating me asures could be proposed <br /> other than the catch basin with the drain to the beach. <br /> Ms DeKimpe stated it is necessary for the catch basin to be there <br /> because of the erosion problem witnessed when the revetment was built. <br /> Mrs. Marsters asked if it could be drained in the other direction, <br /> inland. <br /> Ms DeKimpe stated it might be more trouble to change it, <br /> Ms Behrman stated if there had been proper revegetation at the time <br /> and there wasn' t the use of heavy equipment that caused the erosion, <br /> there wouldn' t be a problem. r <br /> Mr. Rosenberg stated another problem is the existing garage being on <br /> New Seabury property. Ms DeKimpe stated she had nothing to do with <br /> the garage. <br /> Ms Behrman moved that the Board issue an enforcement order concerning <br /> the garage. <br /> Mrs. Marsters stated it is not the commissionts place to enforce that, <br /> it is New eabury' s ,job. She also suggested the pipe be cut off with <br /> something in the catch basin so it won' t take any more water. <br /> Ms DeKimpe stated if they get the plants in and vegetate it, the <br /> volume of water soing through tie pipe will be reduced. <br /> The consensus of the commission is that the pipe in the revetment is <br /> not wanted * Mrs. Marsters stated first put in the vegetation, that <br /> will take up some of it and then redesign it to take up the nest o <br /> the water. <br />