My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7/13/1989 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
>
7/13/1989 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/21/2018 5:09:01 PM
Creation date
2/21/2018 1:49:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
CONSERVATION COMMISSION
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
07/13/1989
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
a <br /> 4 <br /> f <br /> on omm <br /> July 1.3, 1959 <br /> Page 3. <br /> he was talking about a butter zone, the ommissioln`s area of <br /> concern under the statute is with any activity taking place <br /> within 100 feet of the wetland or the water. It is not <br /> question of prohibition but a question of the extent of the <br /> jurisdiction of the commission. The Commission has no <br /> jurisdiction outside the 100 foot area with only limited � <br /> exceptions, <br /> Mrs. Kilty, 281 Cranberry Ave. , stated they have been t <br /> every meeting and cannot see why a variance is requested and <br /> is surprised with water coming into the area that this would <br /> come about at such a close date to that arrival. She does <br /> not want to create more problems with the pond. <br /> Mr. Rosenberg pointed out there is no variance being <br /> discussed, he is before us because he is within our <br /> jurisdiction. He has the right to build the house without a <br /> variance, none is required. The Commission has no authority <br /> to grant variances, they are handled by the Board of Appeals. <br /> Mr, Roberti stated they went to the Board of Health for the <br /> variance as they have strict guidelines for setbacks. <br /> Mrs. Kilty asked i he was' asking be closer the pond <br /> than normally allowed and was told he was not. She thought <br /> it was in different letters the building was to be located <br /> closer to the pond. <br /> Mr. Coffey thought thee was a reference to either 70 feet or <br /> 1 feet in different plans, so the building has moved back <br /> and forth. <br /> Mrs, Kilty stated it was more towards the street in the <br /> original pians which seemed great and all of a sudden that' <br /> have been changed instead of staying closer to the street and <br /> further away from the pond. It has been moved closer to the <br /> pond because of the septic. <br /> Mr. Roberti stated when they originally came before the board <br /> the septic system was within 100 feet of the pond and the <br /> house way up. In terms of en irorimental safety, it is more <br /> safe to have the house within 100 feet so they had to flip- <br /> flop and moved back to reach the limit they are at now with <br /> the septic well over 100 feet. <br /> Mrs. Simmons pointed out when the house was forward the <br /> septic tank was in the gear of the house which was worse. <br /> Mrs. Kitty stated there was no way that was allowed, that was <br /> put out immediately. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.