My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7/13/1989 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
>
7/13/1989 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/21/2018 5:09:01 PM
Creation date
2/21/2018 1:49:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
CONSERVATION COMMISSION
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
07/13/1989
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ConComm ' <br /> July 13F 1987 <br /> Page 6. <br /> eliminating the till and using the difterent growth. <br /> rs. Simmons asked it the work limit could be brought In and <br /> was told it was at the maximum now. <br /> Mr. Rosenberg asked it- the wall was going to be built from <br /> the inside and was told it will be built before they fill it. <br /> They tried to keep the work limit confined recognizing they <br /> are in the ACES:. They have already had a decision from the <br /> Board of Appeals to move the house further inland from the <br /> A E . A pervious drivewway is proposed. <br /> Lee Goldstein presented a planting plan, No areas of grass <br /> are proposed. Not all existing vegetation needs to be <br /> disturbed in the front or back. Native plantings, <br /> particularly in the back are proposed. Along the sides where <br /> the foundation is showing, they have proposed lattice to b <br /> adhered to the wall with plants. Thee will be minimum <br /> disturbance which can be reulced and replanted. - <br /> Mrs. Simmons asked it paths were proposed down to the water <br /> and was to i d none were, there is no acces6from the back. <br /> Mr. Sherman stated the hearing can be closed under Ch. <br /> 131.40, but not under the local bylaw as the Board of Health <br /> approva. has not been received. <br /> Mr. Coney asked for clarification on the square footage, <br /> what about the patio; is that 930 for the patio around the <br /> pool Mr. Sanicki stated that is deck with storage area <br /> underneath. Mr. Rosenberg commented the patio is bigger than <br /> the pool. <br /> Ms Goldstein stated as tar as square foot coverage, it`s not <br /> considered a deck because it's built into the ground. <br /> Mr. Rosenberg stated not by the commissionp it isn't. <br /> considered built into the ground, <br /> Mr. Burns asked it they were going to put trees all around <br /> there and asked about the area around the pool. Wouldn't <br /> that be considered deck What is that area's square footage? <br /> Mr, Rosenberg stated they want to fill that entire area up to <br /> 10 feet high. <br /> Ms Goldstein advised the pool is 180 s . ft, and the deck is <br /> 4. <br /> Mr. Sa.nicki, advised the patio area shown here is not included <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.