My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8/24/1989 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
>
8/24/1989 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/21/2018 5:03:02 PM
Creation date
2/21/2018 1:51:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
CONSERVATION COMMISSION
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
08/24/1989
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
August 24, 1989 <br /> Proposed Regulations <br /> Page 8. <br /> BEHRMAN: You can also submit written comments without being at the <br /> hearing, so anyone is welcome to do that. <br /> CHAIRMAN:: I t has been stated In the paper also. <br /> IITA: l hope this meeting will be reported in the paper and that <br /> comment will appear also. <br /> The address for written comments was given by the Conservation Agent. <br /> ALDER : My first comment was that I questioned whether this can be <br /> done at this meeting or at Town Meeting and since then, someone else <br /> asked the question and you came up with the fact that it can' be done <br /> by this Commission. I would respectfully ask before you make that <br /> conclusion that you ask Town Counsel , based upon my first comments , <br /> SEI ERG: We have. <br /> PETER SALIS: My parents have owned property on # ashpee-- akeby Pond <br /> for 30 years and coming down to Mashpee for 15 years more than that. <br /> When we bought the property it had a dock 30 feet long. The total <br /> value of the dock at that time was probably a few dollars. Since that <br /> time, we have rebuilt the dock each year as needed , as boards rot. I <br /> is essentially the sane structure as when we bought the house. The <br /> total value of the dock now is approximately $100 , we figured, <br /> checking out the wood and few nails .involved. The deepest part of the <br /> dock is probably up to my waist. My father is 72 and the structure i <br /> one that I can put in for ray parents to use. We cannot of ford the <br /> kind of money being suggested for engineering to make this dock comply <br /> or whatever it has to do. I assume the dock would have to be consider- <br /> ably <br /> nsid r- <br /> ably different than it is now to make it anything an engineer would <br /> cert i`fy or put his name on. Although it' s sturdy, it' s a couple of <br /> planks on solme sawhorses. We think that in our case, as • ,ell as a lot <br /> of others, there should be some grandfathering clause involved since <br /> especially the State regulations that Mr . Halpern spoke about talk <br /> about the wetland, about removing; filling o`r altering and I know, <br /> speaking for ourselves, our dock does not remove r fill any wetland <br /> and I think it' s highly questionable whether it alters. At the point <br /> it doss touch the shore, it is 3 - 2 X ' s resting on shore. I think <br /> it is a treen does .burden to put on anyone. <br /> CHAIRMAN:: I s your dock a temporary dock,- you take It out? (It is a <br /> temporary, yes) . It would not be subject <br /> SALEfIS: To the State regulations, right? what l understood was that <br /> the Town was trying to pass regulations similar for temporary. <br /> CHAIRMAN: No, sir. ' <br /> SALE I Well , I still think that what I said I stand by. <br /> CHAIRMAN:: Cer•tainl y what you say applies to permanent docks as well , <br /> th, cost factor, we understand that. Chapter 91 'does not apply to <br /> temporary docks. <br /> SALE I S* And the town? <br /> CHAIRMAN: At this point the Town has no intention of including <br /> temporary docks. We will mirror what the- state will do. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.