My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8/24/1989 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
>
8/24/1989 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/21/2018 5:03:02 PM
Creation date
2/21/2018 1:51:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
CONSERVATION COMMISSION
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
08/24/1989
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
August 24, 1989 <br /> Proposed Regulations <br /> Page 9. <br /> SALI : From what I understood, the Town had the intention of <br /> including temporary structures. <br /> O E B : Only to the extent, anything which is included, if you read <br /> the section it states that anything, whether temporary'or permanent, <br /> which is included in Chapter 91 , will be the subject of the town <br /> regulation, Anything tat is not regulated under Chapter 1 ill not <br /> be regulated under the Town regulations. <br /> ALEXIS= The Town is not going beyond the State in terms o <br /> regulating? (No) . <br /> K0 LIi SK : I gust want to point out wh t Haight happen if these reg- <br /> ulations go through. - People who cannot afford to re-en i ee . thea <br /> ill be forced to tear then down which will cause environmentally' . <br /> quite a bits of damage to thebanks and to the hel l fish-. I ' ve already <br /> had one case on Little Kiger. The mars, When he saw these regulations,. <br /> he tore down a wall which was preventing theroad runoff into Little <br /> River, so, w ' ve had one case. <br /> Now, the other case is, in case they ,do tear down , these walls and` <br /> these piers, people will still have boats and these boats then, I know <br /> what I would do, I ' d stick it up against the bark and throw the anchor <br /> on the shore and another anchor off the rear. You' d -still h-ave a boat <br /> and I can' t see how the State could ever to - away i boating privileges <br /> from the population without a revolution. I gust want to po-int out we <br /> may be casing a lot of environmental damage a-s e'. start rreoing { <br /> these structures, if we have -to. <br /> JOHN COCOMAZZI : I live on Monomoscoy. Twenty odd years ago ' I went <br /> through the process of 'having my waterfront engineered, surveyed,- an t <br /> went through the permit process, got a eryth i n .� legal and recorded. I <br /> was wondering what the status of my situation is now, <br /> CHAIRMAN: I assume you have a license in per etuity. <br /> OOOO A ZI = It is recorded in the Registry of Deeds. } <br /> BURNS: Do you have any reference td Chapter 91 license? <br /> COCOA I : I don ' t believe there was such a tiring 20 years ago, was' <br /> there'd <br /> BURNS: This soes back to 1`866, which they never enforced, and now ;- ti <br /> they ' re , go i n8 to enforce it} that 9 s what th is whd l e thing ;1-s all about <br /> O O IA I : If I d (You' ll- be fine) . Who issued that at that time? <br /> (The State, and it was up to' your engineer to get it) Which depart . <br /> went i_n- the State, DivisLion of Waterways? (That' s right) . ' I know the <br /> permit ,process did go through the Division of Waterways. So, �an,y ody <br /> in that situation should not have anything to worry abo'ut. <br /> B S: It' all u er O pte l perlod.+ If you had a good engineer, <br /> e should have known what to apply for, , <br /> OOOO JA i : Do l have to prove th-e point? - (That ' s correct) . . . <br /> CHAIRMAN: You must have the documents and 1 wourldn",t worn about i- <br /> 6nt i l' the law is updated. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.