10/19/1989 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes

Home Browse Search

Conservation Commission October 19, 1989 Page 7. 1 ' . Coffey asked if both buildings were tied into a sewage disposal system? iI r Spohr stated no., they had a toilet in the shed which went into a dryweii • According to Nor. Nahigian, Mr, Spohr stated he did not see this, the building was ,hacked up because the floor had gone and they put some heavy timbers, 3 X 6's. which stick out for a future deck. 1s Behrman stated the RDA goes beyond the existing shed. Ir. Sp hr stated it did not, it is just to discuss Mr. I ahigian's vi l lation of putting the foundation in that proximity. Ms Behrman stated any further construction on that shed should be a subject of a Notice of Intent. Mr. Spohr agreed there was no question about that. r Richard Mailley, president of Ash umet-John i s Pond Assoc. spoke as an abutter. He was in favor of all the improvements ents Mr. Nahigian has proposed and everything that has been done is a ,boy to see. Mr. Desrosiers asked if the property was occupied now and was told it was not. He asked if the Board could take action to ensure that i.t is not, until the problem is corrected. A memo will be sent to the Board of Health expressing concerns* VOTE: Notion made and seconded for a Negative Determination, only on the work that has been done on the shed to date. 9: 15 GEORGE BEGAN J + for a Determination of Applicability on a proposal to place wood chips at 177 Timberl ane Drive. There was no one present for this hearing. Mr. Sherman advised this is the result of an Enforcement Order; most of the bark chips have been spread. If this were anyone else, he would have no problem with it. It was noted in the past five months there have been three enforcement orders on Ir. Regan. Mr. Coffey asked if any of the chips would end up in the pond? Mr. Sherman advised what has been done so far is not a problem. Mr. Regan alleges the wood chips were originally there and he wants to replace them because they were damaged. Ms Dehrman stated there were no wood chips there originally and she would prefer to see ground cover. 1r. Sherman stated they are also on the. adjacent lot on the north side. - Ms B h rman asked if this will affect the resource area? If they have been badly damaged, the implication is they did not stay putt. . Sherman asked the status of the main house revegetation. It was noted this is in the hands of Town Counsel . It was agreed this should be referred to Torn Counsel as the work is proposed on the same lot. Mr. De rosiers pointed out there was no address stated on the Request for Deter- mination. DISCUSSION TO BE CONTINUED TO THE NEXT MEETING AS NO APPLICANT WAS PRESENT TO DISCUSS THE MATTER.