Laserfiche WebLink
10 <br /> P <br /> ATLA C DESIGN & CONSTRU N INCe <br /> October 30, 1984 <br /> Mr. Aaron cohere <br /> Triple A Engineering <br /> P. o. Box 7149 <br /> Warwick, RI 02887 <br /> Dear Mr. Cohen. <br /> The situation regarding site work is frustrating for all of us. In <br /> large measure this frustration comes about because the building had <br /> to be moved slightly (40'-0"). Masachi corporation has addressed <br /> four letters to you relative to this subject. <br /> September 24, 1984-relative to fill to raise the level of the floor <br /> of the building by 21-011. This was done to ease the burden of <br /> excessive quantities of fill having to be removed around the entire <br /> site to achieve the lower level of finish grade by lifting its grade <br /> by V-0". This larger volume of fill was abrogated. However* at a <br /> meeting of the building committee, you agreed to allow the work to be <br /> done at no cost because of the anticipated cost savings by not having <br /> to remove so much extra fill . <br /> September 28, 1984-relative to movement of building on site. We object <br /> to the mobilization charges because there is still work on the basic <br /> contract that can and should be done not related to the location of the <br /> building or the decision thereto. We feel we have noir come to a decision <br /> that allows this work to proceed. We believe that you had to clear ars <br /> extra 112 acre of land to accommodate the move, and may yet need to clear <br /> 2,000 square feet of land of trees to accommodate excess fill being <br /> pushed into the hallow to the north Iof the site, since excess material <br /> was s pec i fi ed to be removed from the site and we are still not removing <br /> any fill frdm t.he... site nor are we even removing stumps; instead, they <br /> are allowed to be buried. The town feels that at the very most the <br /> clearing of extra trees seems justified at $1,900 balanced against a <br /> credit of $1,965 for not having to remove material from the site as <br /> near as 1 can interpret this letter. This seems to say, therefore t <br /> that dine'to moving the building there is an excess of 633 yards beyond <br /> what was originally estimated due to the changes in site for a cost of <br /> $2,374, which we hope can be ameliorated by allowing this excess to be <br /> moved to the hollow to the north of the building instead of off-site <br /> removal . <br /> continued..... 4 <br /> I u stria!Park Rc d Asim 9 Phmmxft,M --ith u soft 02360•617/7464700 <br />