Laserfiche WebLink
r <br /> PUBLIC 'WoRCSS BUILDING COMMITTEE <br /> MEETING of NOVEMBER 13, 1984 <br /> The following members of the Public Works 'Bu i 1 di ng Committee were present for <br /> the meeting held at Mash pee Town Hall : Samuel C. Re. John Wyl 1 i e, Chester <br /> Brown, Chester Sheets , doe DiMagg io and Anthony Fi orenti ni . <br /> Ellis Laycock and Verne Polka were also present. <br /> The meeting was called to order at 76,00 p.m. <br /> Ellis advised the committee the site work will be settled this weep. Either <br /> Masaschi will finish, or Aaron Cohen and Jack Cartier will have a new man on <br /> the job. If the other contractor comes in high, Masaschi will be back-charged. <br /> Shop drawings were submitted to El 1 i s by Masaschi via Aaron Cohen. The sub- <br /> mission <br /> ub- <br /> mission for the gas trap was actually a mar hole and was not approved. The man <br /> hole can be made into a gas trap, or the gas trap can be built fn the field <br /> with block and made waterproof and watertight, It does -not have to be precast. <br /> The septic tank and leaching pit for the septic tank were approved. The leaching <br /> pit for the gas trap is approved. They did not submit a drawing of the distrib- <br /> ution <br /> istrib-ution box. A drawing of the well pit was b x 6, not the 8 x 8 specified. They <br /> were told if they could assure that all the materials would go inside a b x 6 <br /> pi t, a credit would be considered, <br /> The committee agreed that a b x b pit would not be acceptable and that the <br /> B x 8 should be required. <br /> Mr. Re pointed out that these items were scheduled for completion on September 150 <br /> John Wyllie stated no easement should be given on the gas trap and it should be <br /> done as shown on the specifications. <br /> Ellis distributed copies of the requisition for payment and copies- of the change <br /> orders with the contractor's signature. The two approved change orders are in- <br /> cluded <br /> n- <br /> cluded for payrient i n this requisition. <br /> The committee rev i eWed, individual items and was not in agreement with the gC <br /> completion shown for site preparation <br /> Ellis advised the 5 retainage on the total contract can be used for any de-- <br /> fi ci-enci es, on any facet of the job. He stated the expans ion. join't comes ander <br /> - the heading of the retainage. The contractor has to correct it, <br /> Mr. Re asked Ellis to give a copy of the requisition for payment to Leo Sweeney <br /> for his review prior to presenting to the committee. <br /> Ellis commended the contractor for taking the b out, as most contractors want <br /> the total change order paid up front, with no withholding. <br />