11/4/1976 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes

Home Browse Search

i Minutes o � the ashpee Conservation Commissj . on DATE: November 4, 1976 Nash pee Town Hall TI ] : . 7:30 p.r The meeting was. called to order by Madam Studley., with the following Commission members in attendance: Madam Chairman Studley, Barbara ra Sloane, Jim Le lair, Charles F o Buckingham and Pauline Fe DeLory., Also in at tendance were Chester Koblinsky, Donald and Nark Blakeman and Bi • � y ll Mr fere. The primary reason for this meeting is to work out order of Condition for Eldredge Engineering Co. on application of Huckabee and Kelleher. le had the hearing and they have been assigned the number . hearing,, � ince our g,, Mrs� Studley received from fix'. Eldredge letter with a check or legal advertising and some change in the pier' dimensi ons o T re changing _ the ramp starting at mean high grater to 121 . Fixedier will 1 . - It does not i p he increase the overall length - it will still be a total of 48, & (Corps of Eng' has not issued a decision on the orders for Puttenroth. Chester Koblinsky is here to discuss this because he went down there to look at it. Mr. Koblinsky thinks that it should be kept at501 opunder and from the looks of this plan, he thinks that the 48, would be all riht bu not the extension - h8l ani. , i g � t y nc hiding the f loaf. If it were bigger, it would make the pond pretty small, especially ifole on the other id it also. his suggestion ]'Petitioner p *e. e �. gg n is t make a mooring. ] etitioner '.s getting an additional 16, with a walkway and 6 X 10 float. The law on floa ting docks says there should be' a distinction between a permanent building and a float-in pier. � would have t reapply ever year. e� making a total request . . here but he should make two requests. Mr. Koblinsk would to 161 ars suggest h u � turn.down other gg, p in a mooring, Mr. Butterworth was limited to h8l , It was .as ked if there was a copy of the re tricti n that Nein seabu.ry had on that. It is subject t the Wet- lands Act, pursuant to a permit being issued by the Conservation Commission. This particular lot is within the 201 easement. This is the only llowble use, except for agricultural purposes '. Buckingham seriously questions whether w should allow anything o be done on that property until the fairs are taken out and that banking re- stored. We 're going ahead and saying "you may put your deck in there pro- viding the overall length is not more than 48 or ' including your h w � r float." If there's not enough water, they can put in dory and apply for a mooring . out in the harbor. Mrs. Studley said that Mr. Eldredge asksu.Ift his letter if w • e will approve the stairway- (in order of Conditions), but we can't. fir. Koblinsky said he has � uie a bank � there and he's got get down there somehow and how, is he going to get down there if we don't allow thefair He's e s got -X 6 timbers about 361, long. It is aesthetically pleasing,easin g, but well within the 201 easement. 'Ir. Buckingham is still thinking along the lines of building bridge. ISrse Studley said that if he were forced to remove the stairway, du during r ng the process of removal, more damage might be done. Make him file a separate Notice Intent. Let* it t where it i it � s maybe more damage will b dome by taking it out than if we left it alone. It-was suggested that he pick p the boards- and regrade. If we say we are going to allow the easement to be violated, thea we are violating the easement. It still stands to reason that if someone else got army with it, someone else could. File Notice of Intent for stirry - this has to be anted upon separatel y. Mr. Buckingham went back to his original premise - if we do allow that