Laserfiche WebLink
It was asked if all permits had been obtained. The art of <br /> the new reo. <br /> lotions pertaining to issuing a denim, f not .ori all the <br /> was discussed. I Buckingham �� � permits, etc <br /> g read from wetlands Protection Actile Motion <br /> must be made if you want to issue a denial on the grounds they a <br /> re atior� the Wetlands Act far � �r�o- , <br /> placing. stairway without filing Notice of <br /> Intent. Mr* Buckingham made motion and Jiro LeClair seconded ,it - it was voted <br /> upon and passed. <br /> k <br /> Eldredge Engineeringha.s asked for.an ex-tension <br /> for the Butterworth <br /> property, reason being they have not received a license from the Cor* <br /> ps Engineers. It was asked if theof <br /> members wanted to grant the extension or <br /> have him refile. Mr. Buckingham would move for an e � <br /> tension �f' it's not <br /> B .tter•worth's fault. Mrs. Sloane inclined to have him refile.. yrs. Dey <br /> would like to know what the Corps of Engineers� decision '. going <br /> Butterworth. the order C ' g g to b n <br /> Conditions limited the size of the single pier <br /> to 481 . Could we -send a mate or letter to the <br /> Corps of Engineers requesting <br /> what their decision is and ,i they'regoing to act i � <br /> g on he time �.m�.t has, <br /> gone by. t was mentioned that if we make thea refilethe wii <br /> original fan and �..f � � rf'�. e the <br /> restrict them o the they will appeal it and we Ill <br /> be back where we started.. We should ask Corps of n ireers w they holding <br /> rit up if theyare- thinking fa ora ly o <br /> unfavorably. Mrs. Sloane opposed <br /> the extension, but It was extended. pp <br /> - 4W M - <br /> Correspondence <br /> Letter from Samuel C fie, with copy of letter from Division of Waterways <br /> stating that a permit is going to be required (copy' attached B <br /> Cons r � fail we send , <br /> e tion Officer down there to inspect it <br /> aw ROM MW <br /> Notice of Intent - concrete and steel works in 'd <br /> � ewater off 1oppo- <br /> eset Bay, Mashpee. <br /> Letter to New Seabury Corp.- from Division of ater a <br /> . *W d. <br /> Mr. Blakeman said that he thought Russell Peters would be here <br /> and that <br /> is the reason he and his wife and Mr. Mar to s appeared a th <br /> wa-nted to know if he had thepp meetn e <br /> f acts right t - if he owns a waterfront lot and <br /> wants to put some kind of stairway down :there to get to the water, he h <br /> apply. If he wants to ch d s to <br /> n trees and not take out the roots$ e does <br /> not have to apply. <br /> It was explained to Xyl# Blakeman that ozi theevious� discussed sussed pr - <br /> perty, there 'is an easement all around this development which says o <br /> not uta y you shall <br /> permant building, Bence, gate, whatever nothing should tone that <br /> barking. This i the first house in that area and if he a ' <br /> g s with an <br /> outright viola-Lion, we don't see how we're <br /> going to control anything <br /> elsethat goes in there e should have talked about <br /> how this could be done with <br /> the least amount of damage to the bank _ he's gotnu h room to do s <br /> g omething- <br /> dif' et. Some sort of ramp that would cantilever over the bank w <br /> . uid help. <br /> Mrs. k man asked., if he was unaware that he had to came to your and <br /> you deny the perml t for the dock temporarily, would you allow hirn to leave <br /> them? It will take a long time to harden the bark UD if he takes steps <br /> out. <br /> Mr. Buckingham i he t s agreeable o being� convinced but wants him to <br /> realize he has dome smething iwrong - it is in is deed and he knew f t. <br /> He would like him to be present here to argue fte no moreleadi i <br /> p g ignorance, <br /> Mr. Blakeman 'again stated that he understood Russell Peters wasi <br /> t be here t object to this on the basis of the g g <br /> suit..t. yrs. Studley d ie said the <br />