My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1/6/1994 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
>
1/6/1994 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/23/2018 5:04:10 PM
Creation date
2/23/2018 1:00:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
CONSERVATION COMMISSION
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
01/06/1994
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Conservation Commission <br /> January 6, 1994 <br /> Page 4. <br /> Mr. Sherman asked how many inches they would have at Mean Low water's <br /> Mr. Mclevish pointed to a .dine representing six inches at Extreme Mean Low water <br /> which is one-half foot lower than Mean Low. <br /> Mr. Gray stated the other alternative was to have a shorter structure with <br /> mooring facility in deeper water; Mr. Blasenak did not like that idea and decided <br /> to take �the option to go with the longer structure. The structure existing in <br /> the past was causing problems with impacts to shellfisheries and the sediment. <br /> It was well documented to the previous Shellfish warden and the Conservation Agent <br /> that there has been prop dredging and prop wash effects. They are in deeper water, <br /> but not much more than previously. He feels they are in a situation where the <br /> Commission will not be in a position to approve what is on the table. He asked <br /> to extend the hearing to allow him to discuss this further with Mr. Blasenak to <br /> convince hien to take a second look at the shorter structure and mooring facility, <br /> rather than face a denial situation and have to go through months of appeals. <br /> Mr. Sherman stated a shorter structure with no motorized craft. Mr. Gray stated <br /> if Mr. Blasenak burs into the other option, it would be the dinghy dock. He gets <br /> the feeling that if they cant t get to deeper water the Commission has ample doc- <br /> umentation to prove that this is detrimental to the shellfishery. Rick York has <br /> indicated he is not comfortable with- the proposal the last time and they have the <br /> same proposal now. The Blasenaks have to accept what the Commission will allow <br /> for that particular parcel. If they don't want to accept that, they can core <br /> back at the continuation and throw this plan on the table and the omission can <br /> decide hoer to deal with that and then the lasenaks carr decide what they want to <br /> do about it. He and Roger can't improve on this plan, they don't have the water <br /> depth and do not have the ability to extend further to get that water depth. He <br /> only sees in his own mind, to shorten the structure and go with a dinghy facility <br /> with a mooring. He has seen the pictures relative to the enforcement and they are <br /> verb vivid, as far as the damage. <br /> 1 <br /> Mr, Homeyer stated it is even shallower than before because the storms washed in <br /> so much sand. <br /> VOTE: Motion made and seconded to continue to January 20, 1994 at 8;10 p.m. <br /> CONIDIM TO JANUARY 20, 1994 - :10 pin. <br /> Ted Tiess and Charles Peterson advised they were in the outer room gaiting for the <br /> hearing to be called for the John!s Pond access ramp facility. The Agent apologized <br /> for not announcing this. The Commission agreed to hear these gentlemen after the <br /> 'hearing agenda was completed. <br /> VOTE: Motion made and seconded to hear Mr. Tiess and Mr. Peterson at :00 p.m. <br /> 7:40 NEW SEABURY Co., LP to continue Regional Beach I ourishment ,program along <br /> Nantucket Sound consistent with the programs as outlined and implemented under <br /> SE 43-936. Michael- Crot ke presenting. <br /> f i <br /> ' + <br /> Mr. Sherman advised there was apermit in existence hat' was . - <br /> � ce t s working well. <br /> Language for an ,Amended order was to be worked out but the permit expired in <br /> the meantime. The permit is being followed with no problems; they were asking <br /> for more flexibility. . Jim Mahala thought that rade sense. <br /> Mr. Grotzke distributed copies f the revised order of Conditions he is proposing <br /> and reviewed theme with the Commission <br /> 4 <br /> f <br /> y <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.