1/6/1994 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes

Home Browse Search

Conservation Commission January 6, 1994 Page 5. Mr. Grotzke advised under condition #15 they had been required to submit to the orn fission and DEP a sample of the beach nourishment and it was difficult to get this to IEP. They would like the option to submit an analysis; that would be helpful. They had been requesting to do it in anticipation of a storm; they would lice the option of doing nourishment either before or after, with advance notice. #16 deals with adding additional nourishment, at :the discretion of the Conservation Agent. # #1 - added in "in accordance with the methodology as outlined in ASTM C-136, y which is the international standard. X19 - the previous order precluded nourishment anytime other than fall,, they would life to be able to nourish from 15 September to 15 April. This would not interfere with -the Piping Plovers. , 1 f Mrs.. Ferrid ash e l `what about rato binds? It was agreed the -agent will: call Henry Barber for his opinion. * ffi � I . Mr. Grotzke stated they can do a visu l 'inspecti ri before doi any nourishment, He stated often in larch there are gory severe storms. A new paragraph was added-entirely: T . rru .ish as-appropriate, Some years 2,000 yds was used, some yea3csolO,000. It is clone net as °a requirement but as an attempt to protect the upland areas. r Mr. Sherman advised he checked with Tim Mahala and he had no problem with that. Mr. Hoeyer asked about the other participants in the beach nourishment program. Mr. Grotzke stated he has expanded the New Seabury Beach Nourishment to Time Watch. Obviously, New Seabury cannot ybe responsible for others; he dial coordinate the nourishment. Mr. Homeyer asked, if these people are required to nourish and renege, will he still do it? Mr. Grotzke stated New Seabury would not do it for thea. 1 Mr, Sherman stated 1f they renege, that could be a violation. Mr, Fitzsimmons asked if the term nourishment referred to sand fill as well as dune grass? Mr, Grotzke stated it has nothing to do with putting in grass. Public comments were requested; none. Mr. Sherman stated concerning fees, the Commission cannot Naive the state Fees and the bylaw states the Commission can only waive for divisions of government. Mr. Homeyer felt as it was partly the fault of the Cormdssion should glue some assistance. NOTE: Motion made and seconded to close the hearing pending receipt of DEP number and comments and the fees* USED PENDI . 7:50 W. BEEBY for an amended order of conditions under S -1198 for the continuation of a rock wall with fill behind at 41 Fiddler Crab Dane.