My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3/10/1994 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
>
3/10/1994 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/23/2018 5:15:19 PM
Creation date
2/23/2018 1:12:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
CONSERVATION COMMISSION
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
03/10/1994
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
iConservation Commission <br /> March 10, 1994 <br /> Page 12. <br /> Delineatim/Plate: A proposed draft standard. order was reviewed. <br /> =: Motion rade and seconded to accept the standard orders written. <br /> G tei n: Request received for a letter from the Commission stating the dock was <br /> inspected, and built according to plan. <br /> vCrfE: Motion made and seconded to send the letter as requested. Unanimous vote. <br /> Gotuit ilder : They are requesting to move the house to a location 15 feet <br /> closer to the resource area. An overlay on the plan was reviewed. They want to <br /> do this before the order of Conditions is amended, <br /> r <br /> VOTE: Motion made and seconded that they must refile and work cannot proceed <br /> without a hearing. <br /> ANGIDW Program: They want to. install a series of one inch diameter steel tubes <br /> in the ground with a pneumatic hammer to take water samples; they will then be <br /> withdrawn. <br /> Mr. Sherman did not feel this was significant enough to require an RDA;_ much of <br /> it is out of the Commission's jurisdiction. <br /> Vim: Motion made and seconded that is will not be necessary for Otis ANG to <br /> file a request for Determination of Applicability, '. <br /> Herring Update: Report from DMT' and FW - to be discussed next agenda. <br /> Enforcement: Mr. Sherman advised•enforcement is under control,, <br /> Robinson has not responded to a fine; standard. procedure of a follow-exp letter will <br /> be sent. <br /> VOTE: Motion made and seconded if there is no response to the follow-up letter in <br /> five days, they i ll--,.be subject ta $�00per dad Fine 4 for each day of <br /> violation. a. � Uhanimo s' vote. . . <br /> Nwanagu has not responded, either party, to any letters seat the past two months. <br /> Mr. Oakley did the work but ultimately, .Mr. , wanagu,_ .land. owner "is 'responsible. <br /> Vim: Motion made and seconded to send a lettergiving then a deadline of five <br /> days to respond or the Commission will thea initiate the $300 per day fine <br /> for each dad of.violation and take all other .rm oes a.ry -'l gal_-steps, <br /> Unanimous mous Note. <br /> D r * Mr. elor 's greenhouse was illegal., according to the Building Inspector. <br /> He has requested to remove it as soon as weather permits and to withdraw his app- <br /> lication. <br /> M: Motion made and seconded t'o approve removal of the greenhouse. <br /> Ice Damage: An advisory to all contractors was published in the newspaper telling <br /> g <br /> them what could be done and what puts would be necessary. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.