Laserfiche WebLink
Conservation Com'mission . <br /> April 7. 1994 <br /> Page 8. <br /> Asked how far into the buffer the pool goes, Mr. Grotzke advised it is 12-1 feet <br /> at the maximum. <br /> Mr. Sherman stated if they desire, the Conunission can deny the pool and they can <br /> appeal. If it were natural vegetation, he would recon men i they deny the pool. <br /> Vim: Motion made and seconded to close the bearing pending receipt of a final <br /> complete plan. John Fitzsimmons - opposed. <br /> Motion carried. <br /> Imo` DE CLOSED PEWING PLAT, <br /> 7:40 A I EXAMER M. LEVIM for proposed basement access and a deck addition at <br /> 1 waterline Drive North. Michael Grotzke presenting. Ms Lannik stepped down <br /> for this hearing. <br /> Mr. Sherman stated he has viewed the project site and there is no impact. <br /> It is all buffer zone. <br /> Public comment was requested: none. <br /> V01'_E: Motion made and .seconded to close the hearing. Unanimous Grote. <br /> HEARING CLOS, <br /> DIEL C. StffTll to amend the Order of Conditions for SE -1191 to remove <br /> and reconstruct a. deck and add a stairway off the side of the house with a walk- <br /> way that would extend to the front of the house at 26 waterway. <br /> Mr. Sherman advised Dr. Smith has been in contact with him; it is a minor project, <br /> They are putting in a dr well because the berm has trapped water. The impact is <br /> negligible. <br /> Vim: Motion made and seconded to- accept the amendment to the Order of <br /> Conditions for SE 43-1191 with the condition that if the drywell <br /> is going to be done by machine, they must contact the Commission <br /> regarding reegetatin. Unanimous Note, <br /> 8:00 JEFFREY & L]1 A TSNER for a Determination of Applicability on the proposed <br /> location-of a 20 ft. x. 40 ft. pool on the seaward side of the proposed residence <br /> at Lot 1435 Shore Drive Nest, Seaside. Michael Grotzke presenting. They are <br /> asking for the location and feasibility of the pool. <br /> Mr. Sherman asked, if given a Negative Determination, they are intending that <br /> to be the location of the pool. He stated that was correct. During the on- <br /> site, the property was not staked, the Determination would -have to be condit- <br /> ioned that staking be done prior to construction. The pool is beyond the 50 <br /> foot buffer zone but the-apron will encroach upon it. <br /> Mr. Grotzke will core in with a full. plan, <br /> r. Sherman was reluctant oto approve anything' und r those conditions. <br /> r <br /> Ms Lannik expressed concern with issuing a Negative Determination without <br /> i <br /> understanding the full scope of the project. <br />