Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Sherman stated he does not agree that matters out of <br /> their control necessitated the continuance. He spoke with <br /> Mr, smith on the telephone and put him on notice. Mr. <br /> Sherman asked the Commission, if they agree to the <br /> continuance, to send an enforcement order stating if Mr, <br /> Smith does not have a complete filing in by the date of the <br /> continued hearing, a fine will be initiated. <br /> Mr. Homeyer made the motion that the project be denied with <br /> prejudice. <br /> Mr. Sherman would not recommend this action. what Mr. smith <br /> has done, from a wetlands standpoint, can be legalized, He <br /> recommended continuing because through an order of <br /> Conditions, the Commission can order appropriate remediation. <br /> Knowing the history of this gentleman, he would want <br /> remediation under an order. Mr. Smith was told he has <br /> exhausted the patience of the Commission. , He recommended <br /> giving him a month and a last notice he will receive a $300 <br /> per day fine through an enforcement order; if it is necessary <br /> to go to court, it will he nailed down. <br /> Mr. Homeyer wanted the enforcement order issued immediately <br /> and the plan on the table in 15 days. He made the motion t <br /> issue an enforcement order immedi <br />