Laserfiche WebLink
Mr, Wightman stated he thought they had met everybody's <br /> concerns, He asked, if tho pier that was there previotsly <br /> did not harm the shellfish, Fahy would this one? <br /> Mrs. Ferriday asked, if they tura the float, where would they <br /> moor the boat? <br /> Mr, Green stated they would cause more damage by having <br /> boat on the inside and one on the outside if the float i s <br /> turned. <br /> Mr. McGrath stated he proposes to cut off 4 feet from the <br /> inland edge, he will lengthen the bent slightly so the piles <br /> will move slightly and they will end up with the two feet of <br /> water that the Shellfish Warden is looking for, Mr, York <br /> agreed that is a goad solution, <br /> Mr. McGrath offered a proposal to satisfy the shellfish <br /> concerns. The float will be 8 x 12 and more than one boat <br /> can be moored, tied up stern to. <br /> A revised plan must be submitted to Beard of Appeals. <br /> Mrs, Ferri'-day requested a written report from the Shellfish <br /> Warden. <br /> Public comments: None, <br /> Tom McClatchy stated where the channel is the deeper water <br /> is. <br /> Mr. Sherman stated it is a fairly restricted area; there will. <br /> be boats docking on the floats. <br /> Mr. McClatchy asked, what about in the narrows? <br /> Mrs, Ferriday stated it is not under the purview of the <br /> commission, <br /> The issue of the galvanized pipes can be addressed with the <br /> Order of Conditions, <br /> Mr. McGrath asked if the Order of Conditions will allow the <br /> replacement to pipes? It will be written into the Order: <br /> HYING CONTINUED TO MARCH 30, 1995 at 7:40 ,m. <br /> CUSHN : The hearing for Cushner was reopened with the <br /> Shellfish Warden present. <br /> Mr. York advised the project was acceptable for Shellfish <br /> standpoint of view. <br /> VOTE: Motion rade and seconded to accept the amendment <br /> for S -1091, Richard M. Cushner, 22 Samoset Rd. <br /> CUSHNAMENDMENT ACCEPTED. <br />