My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5/25/1995 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
>
5/25/1995 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/23/2018 5:01:29 PM
Creation date
2/23/2018 1:41:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
CONSERVATION COMMISSION
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/25/1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
standards of the Act, as well as the bylaw. <br /> There is an encroachment of the 50 feet by the proposed <br /> drive. They are suggesting plantings and mitigation <br /> that more than adequately addressed the 512 s,f. <br /> encroachment. <br /> Robert Gray advised he prepared a report and outlined the v <br /> resource areas involved: An abandoned cranberry bog system; <br /> salt marsh system; the lower portion has an isolated wetland, <br /> flood zone and coastal bank situation. The flood zone <br /> affects two coastal banks. <br /> Mr. Sherman stated this is one of the most complex sites. He <br /> does not think the coastal bank is delineated properly. <br /> Mr, Gray did not do the delineation and will have to check <br /> with Wayne Tavares, <br /> i <br /> i r* Fitzsimmons stated the coastal bank is north of where <br /> they are showing it. To be verified. <br /> Mr. Gray advised the red line is the 50 foot setback off the <br /> salt marsh system,. He recognizes the Commission tries to <br /> maintain the 50 foot setback for wildlife habitat value. At <br /> the time the plan was received, the driveway cane in at <br /> different Location. This is a better Mace to put the <br /> driveway to preserve wildlife habitat for much greater <br /> species diversity. The other factor is the wooded swamp and <br /> he suggested Thr, Tavares realign the road for a corridor <br /> between the two points. The house is back 50 feet at all <br /> points, There is 57 s. f. of driveway inside the 50 foot <br /> buffer. An additional area will have to be impacted; 512 <br /> s.f. of impact in the buffer zone, <br /> After the initial study was done, he was asked to look at the <br /> possibility of a house where the top of the coastal bank <br /> comes in. The slope coming down into the wetland ranges30- <br /> 35 <br /> into the Bvw,, o with some of the transects, He worked <br /> with the footprint of the Donovan house, Part of the house <br /> extended through part of the bank. To cut into the <br /> embankment is to put both wetland systems at risk. <br /> One plan had associated rip-rap, At the location proposed, <br /> grade is 0-4% , Where is no real erosion problem with this . <br /> From a regulatory standpoint, he could not recommend cutting <br /> the bank, which was addressed in the report, <br /> Mr, Sherman agreed it would be a mistake to to anything <br /> involving cutting into those slopes. He did an outline of <br /> the proposed Donovan house, same square footage, and there <br /> was no problem with it fitting in. No one has explored the <br /> possibility. <br /> Mr. Gray put an overlay on the plan; a good portion of the <br /> house would necessitate a cut if orientated* <br /> Mr, Fitzsimmons stated that is because it is a different <br /> footprint. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.