My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7/13/1995 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
>
7/13/1995 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/23/2018 5:23:15 PM
Creation date
2/23/2018 1:47:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Mashpee_Meeting Documents
Board
CONSERVATION COMMISSION
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
07/13/1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
3 July 1995 <br /> Fuge 9 . <br /> her . Slavinsky asked if they could include the reserve area <br /> next door that o n o e built upon in the oaks? <br /> M r . Sherman asked if it is part of the original subdivision <br /> d it was . It would have to be taken under advisement <br /> because it would set a precedent . <br /> When the reg was set up , It was to calculate on individual <br /> lots . hie would say , if you want o do that , you will h ire to <br /> o subdivision calculations to show it is under 5 ppm and <br /> only on that part that cones under our jurisdiction . He has <br /> forms for subdivision c lcs he will provide to them . Details <br /> will have to be worked out for the silt fence . He asked for <br /> narrative on the well and trench . <br /> Public comments: <br /> Paul Comorol l , 101 Edgewater d . , stated his concern is the <br /> steepness of the bank . The septic system might be a source <br /> of possible pollution in the future , leaking out onto the <br /> banking and down to the water . ale is talking about breakout . <br /> It was suggested he speak with the Board of Health as the <br /> Commission has to defer to their judgement . <br /> Mr . Sl nsky advised the septic plans were approved by the <br /> Board of Health based on the effective depth , 2 '9" for the <br /> leaching , it is 20 feet below ground . <br /> Mr . Common stated he would still have objections for the <br /> Protection of the pond . What is the minimum requirement from <br /> leaching field to someone 's well? He was told 150 feet . <br /> Mr . Sherman stated his concerns are legitimate but should be <br /> directed to the Board of Health . <br /> Mr . Sherman cited one other issue ,, there is ars indication <br /> from the Town Treasurer that there are still taxes owed on <br /> this property which means that under 172 no permit could be <br /> issued until the Treasurer signed off . <br /> Mr . Commo l stated this gentleman over her e j Mr . Ahearn , <br /> lives across the street from the lot and they did <br /> measurement ent to the center line of the distribution lox and it <br /> is 142 feet , so that is less than 150 feet . He stated he <br /> understood that is up to the Board of Health . his well is <br /> plus or minus 15o , he was not sure . <br /> Evelyn Buschenfeldt who lives across the pond stated her <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.