12/28/1995 CONSERVATION COMMISSION Minutes

Home Browse Search

1 28 December 1995 Page ' . 7:50 ROBERT HOMEY , 398 Monomoscoy Road, continued from 14 December 1995. Hearing is continued to 25 January 1996 at 7:40 p.m. at the request of the applicant. CONTINUED To 25 JANUARY 1996 AT 7:40 PNL ROBERT E. LEE, 51 Bayshore Drive, continued from 30 November ember 1995. Dave Sanicki stated mutual agreement was reached with the Agent concerning the coastal bark. 1111x. Sherman disagrccd in that in their telephone conversation they discussed that he went out and did some more studies and on one foot intervals he could std detect a 1-4 slope and he asked Mr. Saricki if he could go on the one foot contour and agree that the bark would he at the 21 foot contour, which he interpolated to be Half way between the 20 and 22. As it tuirns out on the plan, it is not half way, it is down from half way, noticeably, which just happens to give then 1.01 feet , keeping them outside of the nutrient loading regulation. He asked if that is a coincidence? A& Sack! Mated no, he interpolated the ground charts. A& Shernnan stated the movement of a n ll meter on this plan makes a difference as to whether or not here would be a nutrient loading situation or not. Mr. Sanicki stated there is a 20.9 and Mr. Sherman is asldng for 21. which he agreed to and so noted on the plan. 11x. Sherman pointed to the 20 foot contour and the 22 and stated on one plan they are about 8 feet apart, on the other they are 12 feet apart. Sanicki agreed A& Sher an agreed that he has it shown about the same distance up from the 20, but the 22 as shown is considerably higher. When speaking on the phone, he asked can it be assumed it is half way between the 20 and 22 and thought it was agreed. On this plan it is not half way. 1&. sanicid stated they discussed 21 and taking the 20.9 and....... . Sherman stated they nearer discussed taking the 20.9 because the plan was not in front of them during the discussion. �. Sanicki stated they initiafly looked at this plan and he had the top of hank at elevation 20. 1W. Sherman stated he was looking at the latest remised plan and they discussed putting it Half way between the 20 and 22; it is not half way but if going by this, how come there is only 8 feet between these contours and dere is 12 feet shown on the other. He is of the opinion, when it is this close, the Commission should invoke Section 12 and get another option as to where the top of the coastal bank is unless the client wants to put in a two bedroom house or deriftiffing system. He recommended the Commission not rake a decision.tonight. The Chainnan read from the minutes of the previous heafig.