Laserfiche WebLink
x <br /> 28 December 1995 <br /> Page 8. <br /> Mr. Shan stated under Section 12 of the bylaw the Commission has a right to bring in <br /> someone else. There is no certainty that the septic system is out of the Concession's <br /> jurisdiction. He listed the options and asked if the client would agree to tom? <br /> A& Sanicki stated they will hie an independent survey if shun where A. Sherman <br /> wants the surrey fine. <br /> T&. Sherman requested the name of the surveyor to be used. <br /> Public comments: none. <br /> VOTE: Motion made and seconded to continueto 25 January 1996 - 8:20 p.m. pend <br /> second opinion by an independent approved surveyor. Unanimous Vote. <br /> CONTINUEDCONTENUED TO 25 JANUARY 1996 AT 8:20 P.N. <br /> 8:1 SHAWN JEWELL, 25 Nobska Road, continued from 30 November 1995. Dave <br /> Sanicki presenting. <br /> �&. Sherman wised that Ikon Schall confirtned there is a line of wetland violation above <br /> the line shown on the plate not very Targe, 8 or 10 feet. He found that sod did not <br /> corroborate it; soils have been altered. Because there is a question where the line i , he <br /> suggested to pull the house back four feet so tire would be a true 50 foot buffer. The <br /> Board of Health would pmt moving the septic; a variance would be needed from Board <br /> of Appeals to move the house four feet closer. <br /> l r. Sanicki advised he is request a continuance because fir. Jewell is on vacation and <br /> has not had a chance to review the request to move the Mouse. He has no rear yard for the <br /> house, it is all front yard. He was hoping to 1 ecp the house where it is and loop at the <br /> architectural end of the house to see if he could move things around without going to the <br /> Board of Appeals. The Concession has the rear two-thirds of the yard with the restricted <br /> area with the 50 foot buffer ftwn the bog. Mr. Shan agreed with the reasoning for the <br /> continuance. <br /> Publi <br />