Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> 21 Bch 1996 <br /> Page 2. <br /> Mr. Shin stated in tens of identification of the wetland area and remediation plan, the <br /> plan from Sanford Ecological Associates is a good plan. <br /> Rosenberg stated the Commission would be wMing to consider altemative ideas, provided <br /> they meet state and local requirements. <br /> A& VWng stated he understood. <br /> A* Sherman stated something could be prepared to fax to 1r. V ni% tornorrow that <br /> would more explicitly describe what the Chairman is talking about. <br /> Mr. Vir ng thanked time Ci `on.. <br /> 7:00 DASD L. L V ILLE for a Detemfinadon of Applicabffity on the made of <br /> septic system to Title V at 9 Mariner Lane. <br /> 1W. Sherman advised lair. Levefile is doing a simple septic upgrade that is necessary 80 t <br /> 90 feet from the nearest water. It is a flat area with no chance of erosion. The Board of <br /> Health has made the port there should be no expansion ofhing space. He will check <br /> with the Board of Health and recommended a Negative Determination. <br /> VOTE: Motion made and seconded to find a negative detennination. Unanimous Vote. <br /> NEGA'T'IVE DETERA NATI I . <br /> 7:05 ALBERT E. 1 I I IC , 46 Little Neck Lane, continued f am 2122!96. Dave <br /> Sanicki presenting. He advised the Agent requested that Ellis Alen visit the site and make <br /> sons-estihe did, and there is no objection to including them in an Order f Conditions <br /> � � J <br /> and to have a special conation that prior to construction of the butkhead there would be a <br /> site meeting. The bulkhead may be adjusted more inland if there is more erosion. <br /> fir. Rosenberg asked if the intent is that the proposed bulkhead be either as shown on the <br /> plan or in such area further shoreward as.may be determined bconditionss d ed <br /> at the time of construction.. lir. S anici stated that is correct. The bulkhead sloes not <br /> rewire Chapter 91 permitting as it is above the high water mark. The proposed pier will <br /> be done consecutively with the bulkhead. <br /> onerrng the issues raised about the stairways, they put a laterad landing and then a <br /> stairway. If steps are put to either side of his, it will be siting on the marsh and one would <br /> have to walk more in the marsh to go the other way. It is not obsive to the marsh as an <br /> cuing stairway. It is his contention to leavc what is there alone, it is not the <br /> marsh;the party has not abused it <br />